In Grunig, Grunig and Dozier (2002), the final development of symmetry moves beyond the idea that organisations should always fully accommodate publics. Instead, symmetrical communication is best understood as:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Symmetrical communication emphasizes mutual adjustment and negotiated outcomes: it is a dialogic, two‑way process that seeks balance between organisational goals and public interests rather than unilateral concession or coercion.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Two‑way symmetrical model (Grunig & Hunt; refined by Grunig, Grunig & Dozier, 2002): communication is dialogic and relational, aiming for mutual understanding and influence.  
- Symmetry in the 2002 refinement: moves beyond the simplistic idea that organisations should always fully accommodate publics; instead, it highlights negotiation, ethical dialogue, and mutually beneficial change.  
- Concepts: mutuality, negotiation, win–win outcomes, balancing organisational effectiveness with public legitimacy.

2. Step‑by‑step reasoning
- Step 1: Identify the core claim in Grunig et al. (2002): symmetry is not unconditional accommodation.  
- Step 2: Consider what symmetry must therefore represent: a process in which both organisation and publics can influence outcomes.  
- Step 3: Translate that into practice: communication strategies that aim to shift positions of one or both parties toward a mutually acceptable solution—i.e., win–win.  
- Step 4: Compare this interpretation with the answer options to select the one that matches the mutual adjustment and negotiated outcomes described by the authors.

3. Calculations/intermediate steps
- No numerical calculations are required. The logical intermediate step is demonstrating that "mutual influence" + "ethical dialogue" = "moving both parties toward a mutually acceptable outcome."

4. Why the correct answer is correct
The correct option explicitly states communication is "designed to move organisations, publics, or both toward a mutually acceptable win–win outcome," which captures the negotiated, reciprocal nature emphasized in Grunig et al. (2002). It neither prescribes unconditional surrender by organisations nor unilateral persuasion of publics but centers on mutual adaptation.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- "Ensure organisations always adopt the public’s position": implies full accommodation, which the 2002 formulation rejects.  
- "Designed to avoid conflict": oversimplifies; symmetry can involve constructive conflict resolution rather than mere avoidance.  
- "Ensure publics accept the organisation’s position": describes one‑way persuasive communication, opposite to two‑way symmetry.

6. Conclusion
The explanation confirms that the best understanding of symmetrical communication in Grunig, Grunig and Dozier (2002) is "communication designed to move organisations, publics, or both toward a mutually acceptable win–win outcome." This matches the provided answer.

In Grunig, Grunig and Dozier (2002), the final development of symmetry moves beyond the idea that organisations should always fully accommodate publics. Instead, symmetrical communication is best understood as:单项选择题

类似问题

Why is the Two-Way Symmetrical Model useful in Public Relations?

According to Kelly P. Werder (2015), the strategic communication messaging framework highlights an important shift in research focus within public relations and strategic communication scholarship. What is this shift?

In Vincent Hazleton’s public relations process model (as discussed by Kelly P. Werder), how are strategic communication messages best conceptualised?

According to James E. Grunig, Larissa A. Grunig and David M. Dozier in Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations (2002), which set of characteristics best reflects “excellent” public relations?

Contingency Theory proposes that organisations manage conflict by:

In Tsetsura (2021) how does media relations fit within the relational paradigm of public relations?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单