Contingency Theory proposes that organisations manage conflict by:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Contingency Theory conceptualizes the PR stance as a flexible continuum between pure advocacy and pure accommodation, so organisations choose positions along that continuum based on situational factors.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Contingency theory of conflict management (Cancel, Cameron, Sallot, Mitrook et al.) holds that there is no single best crisis/PR strategy; instead responses vary across a spectrum from pure advocacy (defend organisational interests aggressively) to pure accommodation (accept responsibility, comply, repair relationships).
- Contingency factors include threat level, legal constraints, public sentiment, organisational culture, relationship history, available resources, and strategic objectives.

2. Step-by-step reasoning process
- Identify the theory’s core claim: strategies are contingent, not fixed.
- Interpret each answer option against that claim:
  - “Moving along a continuum between pure advocacy and pure accommodation” directly matches the contingency view of fluid stance selection.
  - Other choices propose fixed, avoidance, or one-dimensional priorities, which conflict with the theory’s emphasis on situational adjustment.
- Provide applied logic: when an issue threatens safety or reputation severely and public outrage is high, an organisation shifts toward accommodation (apology, corrective action). When false accusations threaten competitive position but legal exposure is low, it may adopt an advocacy stance (challenge claims, defend actions).

3. Intermediate reasoning steps (no numeric calculations required)
- Map situational inputs (threat, stakeholders, legal risk) → weigh contingencies → choose a point on the advocacy–accommodation continuum.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The correct option captures the defining mechanism of contingency theory: adaptive positioning along a continuum rather than a single prescribed action. It embodies the central empirical and conceptual claims of the theory.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Avoiding direct engagement contradicts the theory’s prescription to actively choose an appropriate stance.
- Selecting a fixed communication model before a crisis contradicts contingency’s situational flexibility.
- Always prioritising reputation over relationships imposes a fixed value judgment, whereas contingency theory argues priorities shift by context.

6. Conclusion
- Therefore, the correct answer is “Moving along a continuum between pure advocacy and pure accommodation,” which matches the provided answer.

Contingency Theory proposes that organisations manage conflict by:单项选择题

类似问题

Why is the Two-Way Symmetrical Model useful in Public Relations?

According to Kelly P. Werder (2015), the strategic communication messaging framework highlights an important shift in research focus within public relations and strategic communication scholarship. What is this shift?

In Vincent Hazleton’s public relations process model (as discussed by Kelly P. Werder), how are strategic communication messages best conceptualised?

According to James E. Grunig, Larissa A. Grunig and David M. Dozier in Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations (2002), which set of characteristics best reflects “excellent” public relations?

In Grunig, Grunig and Dozier (2002), the final development of symmetry moves beyond the idea that organisations should always fully accommodate publics. Instead, symmetrical communication is best understood as:

In Tsetsura (2021) how does media relations fit within the relational paradigm of public relations?

Which of the following trees corresponds to a potential parse of the ambiguous sentence below, with correct syntactic categories? Some diagnostics are provided.

Which of the following sentences contain two non-finite verbs? Select all that apply.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单