If gay couples are allowed to marry, then there will be fewer heterosexual marriages and the birth rate will plummet, causing the average age of the population to rise, which will destroy the economy.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This argument combines an appeal to fear and an unsupported causal chain: it is both Scare Tactics and a Slippery Slope.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Scare Tactics (appeal to fear): persuading by invoking frightening, exaggerated consequences rather than evidence.  
- Slippery Slope: asserting that one event will inevitably lead to a series of increasingly bad outcomes without showing the necessary causal links or evidence.  
- Distinguish from Overgeneralization (drawing broad conclusions from limited data) and “Ignoring the Elephant in the Room” (deliberately overlooking an obvious issue).

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- The statement asserts a sequence: legalizing gay marriage → fewer heterosexual marriages → birth rate plummets → average age rises → economy destroyed.  
- Each arrow is treated as a certain, direct causal step with no evidence provided. The speaker moves from a single policy change to catastrophic societal collapse.

3) Intermediate analysis of the chain
- Step A → B: Claiming that allowing gay marriage reduces heterosexual marriages assumes substitution at scale; no data or mechanism is given.  
- B → C: Even if fewer heterosexual marriages occurred, the claim that the birth rate would “plummet” is an extreme extrapolation; fertility depends on many factors (contraception, social policies, assisted reproduction).  
- C → D and D → E: Increased average age and economic collapse are speculative and ignore countervailing effects (productivity, immigration, policy responses).

4) Why the correct answers are correct
- Scare Tactics fits because the passage uses fear-laden, catastrophic language (“plummet,” “destroy the economy”) to intimidate rather than argue with evidence.  
- Slippery Slope fits because it asserts an unproven, inevitable causal chain from one policy to disaster without justifying the intermediate links.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- Overgeneralization: the argument doesn’t mainly claim a broad conclusion from limited instances; it asserts a causal chain and catastrophe rather than generalizing from a sample.  
- Ignoring the Elephant in the Room: the statement is not about deliberately omitting an obvious problem; it advances an exaggerated threat instead.

6) Conclusion
The passage exemplifies both Scare Tactics and a Slippery Slope; therefore the correct answers are Scare Tactics and Slippery Slope, matching the provided answer.

If gay couples are allowed to marry, then there will be fewer heterosexual marriages and the birth rate will plummet, causing the average age of the population to rise, which will destroy the economy.多项选择题

类似问题

Rob Rhinehart started drinking Soylent, and within a couple of weeks his skin had cleared up, his teeth were whiter, he was adding miles to his daily runs, and even his hair was healthier. Clearly, Soylent can cure many diseases.

Which logical fallacies rely on the (incorrect) assumption that the age of an idea/practice/remedy supports the validity of the idea? i) Appeal to ignorance ii) Argument from antiquity iii) Argument from authority iv) Appeal to novelty v) Ad hominem

Which logical fallacies rely on the (incorrect) assumption that characteristics of a person who proposes or believes in an idea affect the validity of the idea? i) Appeal to ignorance ii) Argument from antiquity iii) Argument from authority iv) Appeal to novelty v) Ad hominem

Which of the following is not an example of a logical fallacy?

Which logical fallacies rely on the (incorrect) assumption that characteristics of a person who proposes or believes in an idea affect the validity of the idea? i) Appeal to ignorance ii) Argument from antiquity iii) Argument from authority iv) Appeal to novelty v) Ad hominem

Which logical fallacies rely on the (incorrect) assumption that the age of an idea/practice/remedy supports the validity of the idea? i) Appeal to ignorance ii) Argument from antiquity iii) Argument from authority iv) Appeal to novelty v) Ad hominem

Ad Hominem

Is the following statement true or false? In the products of methylation-hydrolysis, every -OH group corresponds to the position of a glycosidic bond in the starting polysaccharide.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单