One way that anthropologists make an effort to protect informants’ anonymity is by:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Using pseudonyms in both research notes and publications preserves informants’ anonymity by separating identifying information from the data itself and preventing linkage between sensitive statements and real individuals.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Confidentiality and anonymity: obligations to protect participants’ identities and sensitive information.
- Pseudonymization: assigning fake names or codes to individuals so their real identities are not disclosed.
- Data management: keeping the key linking pseudonyms to real identities secure (e.g., encrypted file, separate storage).
- Ethical oversight: Institutional Review Boards and research ethics emphasize minimizing risk of identification.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Goal: prevent others (or accidental breaches) from connecting published or stored data to a real person.
- If researchers record data under real names, that raw material becomes a vulnerability (e.g., if notebooks are lost or subpoenaed).
- Using pseudonyms in publications removes names from outputs that are publicly accessible.
- Extending pseudonyms to research notes means the raw records themselves are already de-identified, reducing risk of disclosure.
- Therefore, the practice that best protects anonymity is consistent use of pseudonyms in both notes and publications.

3. Intermediate steps / practical details
- Create a coding list that maps real names to pseudonyms.
- Store the mapping separately and securely (e.g., encrypted file, locked cabinet).
- Use pseudonyms consistently across notes, transcripts, and publications to preserve contextual coherence without revealing identity.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Referring to individuals in both research notes and publications using pseudonyms directly removes identifying information from both internal and external documents, minimizing the chance that a participant can be re-identified from either published material or raw notes.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- Altering details when writing about sensitive topics: This can distort the data and is unreliable for preventing identification; subtle combinations of altered details can still allow re-identification and raises transparency issues.
- Anonymizing names in publications but using real names in notes: Leaves raw data vulnerable—accidental loss, unauthorized access, or a subpoena could reveal identities.
- Using real names of communities but not people: Naming communities can still identify individuals (small communities or well-known events), causing harm; it does not fully protect anonymity.

6. Conclusion
Consistent pseudonym use in both research notes and publications is the best practice for protecting informants’ anonymity. This matches the provided correct answer: referring to individuals in both research notes and publications using pseudonyms.

One way that anthropologists make an effort to protect informants’ anonymity is by:单项选择题

类似问题

When writing the report about the interviews we will refer to participants using:

On the consent form, we will collect:

Which of the following is not of ethical concern regarding survey research on the Internet?

What is plugging?

In the context of an IT research study, when recruiting human participants for a study, you must ALWAYS do the following:

A researcher in the Faculty of Education is investigating tutors’ experiences. She discovers some have been underpaid by the University of Melbourne. She publishes her research and uses the media to advocate for change. Is the researcher’s action appropriate at the University of Melbourne?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单