According to the cognitive-behavioral model, intrusive thoughts are more likely to become obsessions if they are evaluated as:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Cognitive-behavioral models of OCD emphasize that the appraisal of intrusive thoughts determines whether they escalate into obsessions. When an intrusive thought is judged as significant, dangerous, or indicative of the self, it is more likely to provoke distress and repetitive ruminative or neutralizing behaviors that consolidate an obsession.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Intrusive thoughts are common and nondiagnostic in themselves; most people experience them.
- Cognitive-behavioral theory (e.g., Salkovskis, Rachman) holds that maladaptive appraisals (e.g., thought-action fusion, inflated responsibility, overimportance of thoughts) convert benign intrusions into obsessions.
- Neutralizing behaviors (checking, reassurance seeking, avoidance) are negatively reinforced because they temporarily reduce anxiety, maintaining the cycle.

2. Step-by-step reasoning process
- Step 1: An intrusive thought arises (e.g., “I might hurt someone”).
- Step 2: The person evaluates that thought. If they appraise it as trivial, no further processing occurs. If they appraise it as highly meaningful or threatening, anxiety increases.
- Step 3: Anxiety triggers attempts to neutralize or suppress the thought (rituals, checking, reassurance).
- Step 4: These behaviors reduce anxiety short-term, reinforcing the idea that the thought was dangerous or important and increasing the frequency/intensity of the thought, forming an obsession.

3. Intermediate logical steps
- Intrusion → appraisal (importance/danger) → distress → neutralizing behavior → reinforcement → chronic obsession.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Appraising intrusive thoughts as “overly important” (i.e., attributing excessive significance or meaning to them) is precisely the cognitive distortion described by CBT models that leads to obsessions. Overimportance makes intrusions salient, threatening, and worthy of control efforts, which sets up the obsession cycle.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- “Infrequent and manageable”: Such appraisals reduce salience and do not lead to obsessions.
- “Easily dismissed without emotional distress”: If thoughts are dismissed, they do not trigger the maintenance cycle.
- “Unthreatening”: An appraisal of nonthreat prevents escalation into obsession.

Conclusion: Therefore, intrusive thoughts are most likely to become obsessions when evaluated as overly important, matching the provided correct answer: “Overly important.”

According to the cognitive-behavioral model, intrusive thoughts are more likely to become obsessions if they are evaluated as:单项选择题

类似问题

According to the DSM-5-TR, which of the following is necessary for a diagnosis of Persistent Depressive Disorder?

Which of the following is NOT a mood disorder in the DSM-5-TR?

Modigliani and Miller show that accounting for corporate income taxes significantly changes the outcome of their capital structure analysis. Specifically, given a firm’s investment policy, the tax deductibility of interest expense increases the market value of a levered firm…[Fill in the blank]

Which of the following is NOT a criterion for Generalized Anxiety Disorder?

Sensory sensitivities and generalised anxiety are MOST likely to co-occur alongside:

Which of the following is correct information about substance withdrawal as defined in the DSM-5?

According to Shannon Vallor, why are “techno-virtues” increasingly important in the age of AI? (Select one or more answers)

Which statement BEST captures a major ethical distinction between the “switch,” “loop,” and/or “bridge” variants of the trolley problem as they are discussed in AI ethics?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单