A cross-functional project has recurring clashes between development and operations about priorities. Rather than forcing a quick agreement, the project manager brings both sides together to map trade-offs, brainstorm options, and agree on a shared plan. Which conflict management style is this

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This is the collaborating/problem-solving style from conflict-management theory (Thomas‑Kilmann model), so "Collaborate or problem solve to integrate multiple perspectives."

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Thomas‑Kilmann conflict modes: collaborating (integrating), compromising, competing (forcing/direct), avoiding (withdrawing), and accommodating. 
- Collaborating is high in both assertiveness and cooperativeness: parties work together to find a solution that satisfies underlying concerns of all stakeholders. It uses open communication, joint problem-solving, mapping trade-offs, and creating a shared plan.  
- Other styles: compromising seeks a quick middle ground, forcing imposes a solution, and avoiding postpones engagement.

2) Step‑by‑step reasoning process
- The project has recurring clashes about priorities (a substantive conflict needing resolution).
- The project manager intentionally brings both development and operations together (engagement, not avoidance).
- They map trade-offs and brainstorm options (joint analysis and creative problem solving).
- They agree on a shared plan (aiming for a solution that addresses both sides’ concerns).
- These actions align exactly with the collaborating/integrating mode: joint diagnosis, exploration of options, and co‑creation of a mutually acceptable outcome.

3) Intermediate logical steps (no numeric calculations)
- Conflict exists → manager chooses to engage both parties rather than impose or avoid.
- Engagement includes mapping trade‑offs (understanding interests), brainstorming (generating integrative solutions), and agreeing (reaching a mutually satisfying outcome).
- Therefore the mode applied is collaborating/problem solving.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Collaborating explicitly involves integrating multiple perspectives through joint problem solving, which matches the described behavior: mapping trade‑offs, brainstorming, and creating a shared plan.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- Compromise or reconcile with minimal discussion: implies splitting differences quickly; does not involve deep mapping or integrative brainstorming described here.  
- Force or direct: would mean the manager imposes a decision unilaterally—contrary to bringing both sides together for joint work.  
- Withdraw or avoid: means sidestepping the conflict, which is the opposite of convening parties and reaching agreement.

6) Conclusion
The described approach is collaborating/problem solving. Final answer: Collaborate or problem solve to integrate multiple perspectives.

类似问题

How effective is a team that uses an "accommodating" style likely to be?

During a risk workshop, a tester strongly disagrees with the project manager about the severity of a defect. They debate evidence, challenge assumptions, and agree on a revised risk rating. The relationship remains respectful. How should this conflict be viewed

Leaders having a(n) ________ conflict management style are highly assertive and not very cooperative.

_______Procrastinating difficult conversations tends to prevent a conflict from escalating in a family firm and minimizes frustration.

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单