How effective is a team that uses an "accommodating" style likely to be?

Question

How effective is a team that uses an "accommodating" style  likely to be?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

An accommodating conflict-management style emphasizes yielding to others’ wishes, prioritizing relationships and harmony over asserting one’s own concerns.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument identifies five styles: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating.  
- Accommodating scores high on cooperativeness (concern for others) and low on assertiveness (concern for self).  
- Team effectiveness depends on balanced participation, constructive challenge, and ownership of decisions.

2) Step-by-step reasoning:
- Step 1: Describe behavior — an accommodating team member gives in, accepts others’ proposals, and avoids pushing their own ideas.  
- Step 2: Short-term benefits — this reduces visible conflict, preserves relationships, and can speed decisions when the issue is trivial or the relationship is more important than the outcome.  
- Step 3: Long-term/team-level effects — repeated accommodation suppresses dissenting information, reduces diversity of viewpoints, and allows weak ideas to persist. It can also create resentment or low engagement when contributors feel their perspectives aren’t considered.  
- Step 4: Outcome on effectiveness — decisions may be suboptimal, innovation limited, and team learning impaired, producing performance below what teams with balanced styles achieve.

3) Calculations: Not applicable; evaluation is qualitative based on behavioral dynamics.

4) Why the correct answer is correct:
Because accommodating sacrifices assertiveness and critical input, a team that relies primarily on accommodation is unlikely to identify and solve problems optimally. The loss of constructive debate and ownership typically reduces decision quality and long-term performance, making effectiveness lower than average.

5) Why other options are incorrect:
- “Average” is incorrect because the consistent lack of assertiveness usually pushes performance below a neutral baseline rather than holding it steady.  
- “Higher than average” is incorrect because higher effectiveness typically requires balanced assertiveness and collaborative problem-solving, not consistent yielding.

6) Conclusion:
Therefore, the most accurate choice is “Lower than average.” This matches the provided answer.

How effective is a team that uses an "accommodating" style likely to be?单项选择题

类似问题

A cross-functional project has recurring clashes between development and operations about priorities. Rather than forcing a quick agreement, the project manager brings both sides together to map trade-offs, brainstorm options, and agree on a shared plan. Which conflict management style is this

During a risk workshop, a tester strongly disagrees with the project manager about the severity of a defect. They debate evidence, challenge assumptions, and agree on a revised risk rating. The relationship remains respectful. How should this conflict be viewed

Leaders having a(n) ________ conflict management style are highly assertive and not very cooperative.

_______Procrastinating difficult conversations tends to prevent a conflict from escalating in a family firm and minimizes frustration.

Which of the following trees corresponds to a potential parse of the ambiguous sentence below, with correct syntactic categories? Some diagnostics are provided.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单