You recently joined a team including Paul, Mike, Nicole, and Jennifer. The team is developing a new budget for the department. In the last meeting, Nicole argued with Paul about his method of planning costs. Also, Jennifer argued with Mike about the department’srevenues. Based on this information, is this team likely to be effective?

Question

You recently joined a team including Paul, Mike, Nicole, and Jennifer. The team is developing a new budget for the department.  In the last meeting, Nicole argued with Paul about his method of planning costs.  Also, Jennifer argued with Mike about the department’srevenues.  Based on this information, is this team likely to be effective?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Team effectiveness depends on constructive conflict management, clear communication, role clarity, and group cohesion. When disagreements escalate into arguments between members about core tasks (cost planning and revenue projections), these are strong indicators of dysfunctional interaction that undermines performance.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Task conflict vs. relationship conflict: Task conflict (disagreement about content) can be beneficial if managed; relationship conflict (personal, emotional) is harmful.  
- Psychological safety and cohesion: Teams need trust and open dialogue; repeated arguments reduce safety and coordination.  
- Conflict impact on productivity: Unresolved conflict consumes time, reduces information sharing, and harms decision quality.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Observation: Nicole argued with Paul about planning costs; Jennifer argued with Mike about revenues.  
- Interpretation 1: Two separate arguments indicate conflict is not isolated; more than one dyad is in dispute, suggesting pervasive team tension.  
- Interpretation 2: The term "argued" implies heated or adversarial interaction rather than structured, constructive debate.  
- Consequence: Multiple adversarial interactions likely reduce trust, disrupt collaboration, and impair the team’s ability to cohere around a budget.

3. Intermediate considerations (no numerical calculations required)
- If conflict were purely task-focused and mediated constructively, team effectiveness might remain intact. However, language ("argued") and multiple disputes make constructive resolution less likely without evidence of facilitation or conflict-management processes.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Given the described pattern—two arguments over central budget elements—it's reasonable to conclude the team is unlikely to be effective. The conflicts signal poor coordination and probable reductions in decision quality and morale.

5. Why the other option is incorrect
- Choosing "True" would require evidence of constructive, managed debate or strong conflict-resolution mechanisms; none is provided. The mere presence of arguments does not support claiming effectiveness.

Conclusion: Based on the information, the team is unlikely to be effective. Final answer: False.

类似问题

Organisational effectiveness is typically related to

Work stress -

Overall, the way our workplace continues to evaluate, monitor, and reward performance represents its

Question at position 11 What type of leadership style is better suited for high-complexity, people-focused projects?Transformational leadershipAutocratic leadershipLaissez-faire leadershipTransactional leadershipClear my selection

Why, as a Manager, using influence is the most effective way to make an employee compliant?

Your work team includes many cooperative people. The more you think about it, they just agree with the leader, just to make him/her happy. These people likely have which conflict management style ... ?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单