Question at position 9 In legal terms, "Precedent" refers to:The person who brings the case to courtThe process of selecting new Supreme Court JusticesA previous court decision that serves as a rule or guide for similar cases in the futureA law that has been vetoed by the President

Question

Question at position 9 In legal terms, "Precedent" refers to:The person who brings the case to courtThe process of selecting new Supreme Court JusticesA previous court decision that serves as a rule or guide for similar cases in the futureA law that has been vetoed by the President

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

A previous court decision that serves as a rule or guide for similar cases in the future.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Precedent is a core principle of common law systems often expressed by the doctrine stare decisis ("to stand by things decided"). 
- It means that past judicial decisions—especially from higher courts—are used as authoritative guidance for deciding later cases with similar facts or legal issues.
- Precedent can be binding (a lower court must follow a higher court’s decision) or persuasive (a decision from another jurisdiction or a lower court that may influence but does not bind).

2) Step-by-step reasoning process
- Identify what each option describes:
  - Option 1 describes the plaintiff or prosecutor (the person who brings a case).
  - Option 2 describes the judicial appointment or selection process.
  - Option 3 describes the use of past court decisions as guidance.
  - Option 4 describes a bill vetoed by the president.
- Compare each description to the legal meaning of "precedent" (past court decisions used as rules).
- Option 3 directly matches that definition; others do not.

3) Intermediate logical steps (explicit)
- Precedent = past court decision used for future cases.
- Binding precedent: decisions of superior courts in the same hierarchy control outcomes in lower courts.
- Persuasive precedent: decisions from other jurisdictions or lower courts may influence but not control.
- Therefore, the correct conceptual match is option 3.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Option 3 explicitly states that precedent is a previous court decision serving as a rule or guide for similar future cases, which captures both the practical effect and purpose of precedent in legal systems.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- Option 1: Refers to the litigant who files the case (plaintiff/prosecutor), not precedent.
- Option 2: Refers to selecting justices, unrelated to precedent’s meaning.
- Option 4: Refers to a vetoed legislature action; vetoed laws are not court decisions and therefore are not precedent.

6) Conclusion
- The correct answer is: "A previous court decision that serves as a rule or guide for similar cases in the future," which matches the provided answer.

Question at position 9 In legal terms, "Precedent" refers to:The person who brings the case to courtThe process of selecting new Supreme Court JusticesA previous court decision that serves as a rule or guide for similar cases in the futureA law that has been vetoed by the President单项选择题

类似问题

Which of these helps to provide predictability and consistency to judicial decisions?

Cases that serve as a basis for decisions by judges in other courts are known as:

Stare decisis is the doctrine of ________.

Stare Decisis means:

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单