Xerox's decline in photocopiers best illustrates which strategic lesson?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

International strategies must proactively evolve toward cost efficiency before competitors emerge, because Xerox’s decline shows how early technological leadership can be eroded by rivals that optimize costs, scale, and global operations.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- First-mover advantage vs. sustaining leadership: invention alone does not guarantee long-term dominance.
- Cost leadership and the learning-curve effect: cumulative production lowers unit costs over time.
- Location economies and global scale: shifting production to low-cost locations and leveraging global suppliers reduces prices.
- Disruptive competition: competitors can enter with lower-cost offerings and capture mass markets.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Xerox pioneered photocopying and held strong market share through product superiority.
- Competitors (especially Japanese firms) entered later but focused on process improvements, manufacturing efficiency, and global distribution.
- These rivals exploited learning curves and location economies to produce copiers at lower unit costs.
- Xerox failed to sufficiently reconfigure its international strategy—didn’t move fast enough to lower costs or scale manufacturing globally—so it lost price-sensitive segments.

3) Calculations / intermediate steps
- No numeric calculation is required here; the logical intermediate steps are: invention → market leadership → competitors optimize cost structure → market share loss because original firm’s cost base remains higher.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- The answer captures the core strategic lesson: having an international presence isn’t enough—firms must deliberately adapt their international strategy to achieve cost efficiencies (through global sourcing, production relocation, process improvements) before low-cost competitors make inroads.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- “Firms should never pursue an international strategy”: false—internationalization can create advantages if managed correctly.
- “Strategic alliances always lead to knowledge loss”: incorrect and overly absolute; alliances can enable learning and capability building.
- “Location economies are irrelevant in technology industries”: incorrect—location economies often drive manufacturing and cost advantages even in tech-related hardware.

6) Conclusion
This reasoning confirms the correct answer: International strategies must proactively evolve toward cost efficiency before competitors emerge.

Xerox's decline in photocopiers best illustrates which strategic lesson?单项选择题

类似问题

Question at position 17 Leading companies should recognize that a firm based in a country with a national competitive advantage is not guaranteed ............................ as it implements its chosen international business-level strategy.dominanceplansuccessNone of the Above

Match each international strategy to its CORRECT description. 1: Global Standardization 2: Localization 3: Transnational 4: International 5: First-mover advantage

Question at position 3 Which of the following is NOT a strategic option for choosing whether or not to modify products/services to accommodate varying local customer requirements?Local CustomizationGlobal StandardJoint VentureCombination StrategyClear my selection

Which of the following statements is False regarding the post-closing trial balance?

A closing entry may include a Blank ______.

Earnings per share is reported at the Blank ______ of the income statement.

Table 3 shows the short-run production costs for a car wash: [table] Costs | Cost per month ($) Land lease | 4,000 Workers’ wages | 2,600 Car wash machines | 3,000 Water | 1,500 Cleaning chemicals | 900 [/table] In the short run, calculate the car wash's fixed costs in Table 3.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单