According to the Integration-Responsiveness framework, which strategy is appropriate when a firm faces HIGH cost pressures and LOW pressures for local responsiveness?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

High cost pressures combined with low pressures for local responsiveness indicate a Global Standardization strategy.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- The Integration–Responsiveness (IR) framework uses two dimensions: global integration (cost pressures / need to standardize across markets) and local responsiveness (need to adapt products/services to local tastes, regulations, or conditions).
- Four archetypal strategies arise: Global Standardization (high integration, low responsiveness), Transnational (high integration, high responsiveness), International (low integration, low responsiveness), and Multidomestic/Localization (low integration, high responsiveness).

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Identify the two dimensions in the scenario: cost pressures are HIGH (strong incentive to reduce unit costs through scale, centralization, and standardization) and local responsiveness pressures are LOW (market differences are minor; customers and regulators across countries accept similar offerings).
2. Determine which strategy aligns with high global integration: a company will centralize activities like production, R&D, and marketing to achieve economies of scale and lower costs per unit.
3. Determine response to low local responsiveness: minimal local adaptation is necessary, so the firm can offer standardized products and services across markets without tailoring.
4. Match the combination: High cost pressures + Low local responsiveness directly corresponds to the Global Standardization strategy in the IR framework.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- A Global Standardization strategy explicitly aims to maximize global efficiencies and cost reductions while offering a uniform product worldwide. Centralized decision-making, standardized processes, global sourcing, and mass production are characteristic responses to high cost pressures when local differences are negligible.

Why other options are incorrect (briefly):
- Transnational: requires both high cost pressures and high local responsiveness (not applicable because responsiveness is low).
- International: fits low cost pressures and low responsiveness (not applicable because cost pressures are high).
- Localization/Multidomestic: fits high responsiveness and low cost pressures (not applicable because responsiveness is low and cost pressures are high).

Conclusion: Therefore, the appropriate strategy is Global standardization strategy, which matches the provided answer.

According to the Integration-Responsiveness framework, which strategy is appropriate when a firm faces HIGH cost pressures and LOW pressures for local responsiveness?单项选择题

类似问题

Question at position 10 Global strategy of international business, Offers standardized products across country markets, with the competitive strategy being dictated by the home office.TrueFalse

Question at position 9 Which one of the following is not a benefit of using an international strategy?increased market size returns on investmenteconomies of scalehigher operational costs

How do firms approach customization of products when using the global standardization strategy?

A global strategy, in the context of international business, is best defined as:

A firm pursuing a Global Standardization strategy is characterized by:

A global corporate-level strategy assumes:

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单