Which is the correct order of how children’s descriptions of others develop?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Children first describe others using concrete, observable features—physical appearance, possessions, and overt behaviors—then move to labeling others by psychological traits (kind, mean, smart), and finally develop abstract, trait-based, integrated descriptions that reflect stable internal dispositions.

Relevant concepts: cognitive-developmental progression (Piagetian stages), theory of mind, and increasing capacity for abstraction. Early childhood thinking is perceptual and concrete; as children acquire theory of mind (around ages 4–7) they begin attributing internal states and simple traits; by late childhood and adolescence, abstract reasoning and an appreciation of trait consistency and nuance emerge.

Step-by-step reasoning and examples:
1. Concrete descriptions (preschool to early elementary): Young children rely on visible cues. Example: “She has brown hair,” or “He rides a bike.” This reflects limited abstraction and focus on salient, observable attributes.
2. Psychological traits (middle childhood): With developing perspective-taking and theory of mind, children start describing personality: “She’s friendly” or “He’s mean.” These attributions are simpler and often tied to recent behavior, not yet fully generalized.
3. Abstract traits (late childhood to adolescence): Cognitive maturation enables understanding of traits as stable, internally based, and sometimes domain-specific or context-dependent. Example: “He’s generally responsible but can be anxious in new situations.” This stage shows integration, nuance, and recognition of trait stability and variability.

Why the correct answer fits: The sequence “Concrete descriptions → psychological traits → abstract traits” mirrors children’s cognitive and social-cognitive development from perceptual descriptions to internal attributions to fully abstract trait conceptions.

Why the other options are incorrect:
- “Psychological → abstract → concrete” and “Psychological → concrete → abstract” incorrectly place psychological descriptions first; empirical observation shows concrete descriptions precede trait attributions.
- “Abstract → psychological → concrete” reverses development entirely, implying adolescents’ sophisticated abstraction appears before earlier concrete descriptions, which contradicts developmental evidence.

Final confirmation: The correct order is Concrete descriptions → psychological traits → abstract traits, matching the provided answer.

Which is the correct order of how children’s descriptions of others develop?单项选择题

类似问题

In his TED talk, Kang Lee describes several myths we hold about children's lying. Which of the following is NOT a common belief about lying in children?

A young child who is showing a great deal of interest in and curiosity about the world would most likely be said to be in Erik Erikson’s:

According to Erikson’s theory of developmental stages, individuals must resolve different dilemmas at each stage of life.

What is the most important lesson learned from the study by Mondschein et al. (2000) in which mothers were asked to estimate their babies' crawling ability?

Baillargeon demonstrated young infants’ understanding of objects using which paradigm?

In a video in which children were asked “What do you want to be when you grow up?”, we observed that some careers were gender-neutral whereas other careers seemed more gender-stereotypical. Which developmental theme can best explain these results?

We continue to change and grow as we age in adulthood. Our cognitive development peaks:

In comparing Erikson's theory of psychosocial development to Freud's theory of psychosexual development, we find

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单