If a United States company is determining whether or not to move their manufacturing plant to a foreign nation to help decrease costs but potentially could help the foreign nation build infrastructure and bring needed jobs to that region, the company would use which approach in their decision making?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Cost-benefit analysis weighs the total expected costs against the total expected benefits—both private and social—to determine whether an action increases net value, so it is the appropriate approach here.

Relevant concepts: cost-benefit analysis (CBA) identifies, quantifies (monetizes when possible), and compares all positive and negative effects of a decision, including direct financial impacts, externalities (like job creation or infrastructure development in a host country), and non-monetary effects (environmental or reputational). It often uses discounting to compare future streams to present value and sensitivity analysis to test assumptions.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Identify stakeholders and effects: the firm (labor cost savings, relocation costs, supply-chain changes), host nation (jobs, infrastructure improvements), home nation (job losses, tax changes), consumers (price changes), regulators (tariffs, compliance).
2. Enumerate and monetize costs and benefits: e.g., estimated annual labor savings $2,000,000; one-time relocation cost $5,000,000; added annual compliance costs $200,000; value of social benefits to host nation estimated at $300,000/year (or included as external benefit). 
3. Discount future values to present value (assume discount rate r and horizon n). Example simple calculation without discounting for illustration over 5 years: total savings = 2,000,000 × 5 = $10,000,000; total compliance = 200,000 × 5 = $1,000,000; total social benefit = 300,000 × 5 = $1,500,000; net benefit = (10,000,000 + 1,500,000) − (5,000,000 + 1,000,000) = $5,500,000 positive. A full CBA would discount and run sensitivity checks.
4. Use results and qualitative factors to decide.

Why D is correct: The scenario explicitly involves weighing cost reductions against broader societal impacts—classic CBA. The other choices are jurisprudence theories, not decision-analysis methods: Natural law (moral/legal principles), Common law (precedent-based legal system), Historical school (law evolving from tradition), Legal realism (law shaped by social forces). None provide the economic accounting and trade-off framework required.

Conclusion: The correct method is D) Cost-benefit analysis, which matches the provided answer.

类似问题

According to Dr Paul Hardisty, which of the following is/are essential characteristics of a sustainable "proposition"? Select one or more answers.

Which of the following statements about the Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) is TRUE?

What do you need to consider before signing up for advanced training options?

Regarding the role of the financial manager, select all the correct answers:

Benefit to cost analysis is most often associated with

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单