A contract entered into by a corporation is enforceable:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To begin, let's lay out the question and options clearly so we can compare them.
Option 1: Against the corporation as an artificial person. This is the standard principle of corporate law: a corporation is a separate legal entity, so contracts entered into by the corporation are generally enforceable against the corporation itself as the contracting party.
Option 2: Against the directors of the corporation. Typically, contracts are not enforceable against directors merely because they signed or approved them. Directors may be held liable personally in specific circumstances (e.g., personal guarantees, fraud, breach of fiduciary duties), but absent such circumstances, the contract does not bind the directors personally.
Option 3: Against the shareholders of the corporation. Shareholders have limited liability and are generally not responsible for contracts made by the corporation. A contract is not enforceable against shareholders simply because they own shares.
Option 4: Only if the contract is consistent with the corporation's constitution. The corporation’s constitution (articles of incorporation, bylaws) governs governance and powers, but enforceability of a contract is not contingent on it being consistent with the constitution in the sense implied here; rather, a contract is enforceable against the corporation if the corporation had the power to enter into it and the contract is otherwise valid, regardless of constitutional alignment. So this statement misstates the relationship between contract enforceability and corporate constitution.
In summary, the typical rule is that contracts entered into by a corporation bind the corporation as a separate legal entity, not the directors or shareholders, and are not conditioned on alignment with the corporation’s constitution. The reasoning above shows why each alternative is incorrect except the first.

A contract entered into by a corporation is enforceable:单项选择题

类似问题

Anderson was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ______________

The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.

The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.

Bill owns, operates and is the sole employee of a candy store called Bill's Candy Corporation. A batch of candy was sold past the best-before date. Who should the consumer sue as the responsible party?

In which security measure will you find anti-virus software?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单