Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Allan offered a bribe of RM50,000 to company XYZ to secure a contract to supply computers for his company. If he is found guilty, which of the following people would be charged under corporate liabilities, except for one option?

Option a: The management teams. In many corporate liability scenarios, the management teams can be held accountable because they oversee corporate decisions, approve bribery schemes, or encourage a culture that tolerates corruption. This makes them a plausible target for liability.

Option b: The organization that Anderson works with. If there is a corporate crime connected to a company’s operations, the organization or entity that facilitates or commissions the wrongdoing can be pursued for corporate liability, especially if it played a role in arranging or enabling the bribery.

Option c: The Director of the company. Directors, given their governance role and fiduciary duties, are frequently held liable in corporate misconduct cases when they authorize, approve, or fail to prevent corrupt activities. This makes them a common subject of liability.

Option d: Anderson’s co-workers. This choice suggests that ordinary coworkers who were not involved in planning, consenting, or implementing the bribery would be charged. If there is no evidence of their involvement, they should not be held liable under corporate liability doctrines, which target those with decision-making power or direct involvement in the corrupt act. Thus this option is the one that does not ordinarily trigger corporate liability in the described scenario.

Putting it together, the reasoning points to the fact that while management, the enabling organization, and the company's directors can be implicated due to roles in governance, authorization, or facilitation, coworkers who were not part of the scheme are not automatically liable under corporate liability rules. Therefore, the statement about Anderson’s co-workers being charged is the exception in this context.

Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.单项选择题

类似问题

Anderson was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ______________

The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.

The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

A contract entered into by a corporation is enforceable:

Bill owns, operates and is the sole employee of a candy store called Bill's Candy Corporation. A batch of candy was sold past the best-before date. Who should the consumer sue as the responsible party?

Question at position 1 A firm competing in a single-product market in a single geographic location does not need a corporate-level strategy regarding product diversity or an international strategy to deal with geographic diversity.TrueFalse

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单