Which one would you NOT use to support a strong argument?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

An appeal to authority from a potentially biased or non-expert source is a weak substitute for direct evidence, so you would not rely on a politician’s quote to support a strong argument.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Strong arguments rely on reliable, relevant evidence: empirical data, causal links, and illustrative examples.
- Logical fallacies: appealing to authority is weak unless the authority is an independent subject-matter expert with demonstrable expertise and unbiased standing.
- Evidence hierarchy: primary data and reproducible facts rank higher than testimonial or rhetorical appeals.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- The question asks which option you would NOT use to support a strong argument.
- Evaluate each choice for evidentiary strength and susceptibility to bias or fallacy.
- Decide that a politician’s quote is weakest because it is testimonial, potentially biased, and not necessarily expert evidence even if the topic “relates” to their area.

3. Intermediate steps (assessment of each option)
- Examples where your reasoning works: Concrete examples illustrate generalizations and strengthen reasoning — good support.
- Facts and statistics connecting your position to evidence: Empirical support is strong — good support.
- Facts and data showing causal links: Demonstrating cause-effect relationships is central to strong arguments — good support.
- None of the Answers: This would claim all options are acceptable, which is false because one is weak — therefore incorrect.
- A quote from a senior politician (the choice in question): Testimonial, prone to bias, may represent opinion or political agenda rather than objective evidence — weak support.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- A politician’s quote is an appeal to authority and often rhetorical. Even when the topic “relates,” it doesn’t substitute for objective data, causal analysis, or reproducible examples. It risks logical fallacy and undermines the argument’s credibility.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- The other options (examples, facts/statistics, causal data) provide direct, verifiable, and relevant evidence that strengthens an argument; “None of the Answers” is incorrect because one option is indeed unsuitable.

6. Conclusion
Therefore, the option you would NOT use is “A quote from a senior politician that is in an area that relates to your argument.” This matches the provided correct answer.

Which one would you NOT use to support a strong argument?单项选择题

类似问题

The following questions refer to Chapter 2 (pp. 51-107). In an essay, what is a claim?

Why must writers incorporate criticisms into their text? You may select more than one answer.

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单