In its 2014 Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action decision, the Supreme Court ruled that

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In evaluating the 2014 Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action decision, consider what the Court actually held about state-level action on affirmative action.
Option A: 'affirmative action is a form of reverse discrimination and is therefore unconstitutional.' This interpretation is not what Schuette decided. The Court did not declare affirmative action inherently unconstitutional; it reviewed a state's constitutional amendment prohibiting race-conscious admissions and upheld that state's ban. Therefore this statement is incorrect.
Option B: 'states must follow the same affirmative action guidelines as the federal government does.' Schuette did not establish that states must mirror federal guidelines. It focused on the state's own constitutional amendment and the Supreme Court upheld the state’s right to ban affirmative action, independent of federal guidelines. This option misstates the decision.
Option C: 'taking race into account when deciding who to admit to college is unconstitutional.' The Court did not strike down the practice in general; rather, it allowed a state to prohibit race-conscious admissions. So this statement overgeneralizes the ruling and is incorrect.
Option D: 'the United States Congress can pass affirmative action laws that are binding on both public institutions and private businesses.' While Congress has enacted some affirmative action-related statutes, Schuette specifically addressed a state ballot measure and did not conclude that Congress could bind public and private entities in this manner. This option introduces a broader claim not supported by the decision and is incorrect.
Option E: 'states can pass laws that ban affirmative action at public education institutions.' This accurately reflects Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, which upheld a state's constitutional amendment banning race-conscious admissions in public education institutions. This statement correctly captures the ruling.

In its 2014 Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action decision, the Supreme Court ruled that单项选择题

类似问题

Which show from the eText discussed a lawsuit challenging affirmative action?

As discussed in class, traditionally affirmative action, if done following the appropriate steps, can be legal, as demonstrated by which of the following league and their rule encouraging interviewing minority candidates?

The Rooney Rule is a NFL policy that requires league teams to interview ethnic-minority candidates for head coaching and senior football operation jobs. This is an example of legal racial discrimination commonly referred to as: _______________

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that

In a 2003 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan __________.

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单