§5.3 states the simplest general approach to reduce aggregation/precipitation during Protein A elution is often:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Protein A elution commonly exposes antibodies and Fc‑containing proteins to low pH, which destabilizes tertiary structure and can trigger aggregation or precipitation. Key concepts: protein stability depends on pH, ionic strength, buffer species, and presence of stabilizing excipients; reducing time spent in destabilizing conditions and selecting milder elution chemistries are practical mitigation strategies.

Step‑by‑step reasoning:
1. Identify the root cause: typical Protein A elution uses low‑pH buffers (e.g., glycine pH 2.5–3.5). Low pH can protonate side chains, unfold regions, and expose hydrophobic patches that drive aggregation.
2. Consider general control levers: change the elution pH or buffer species to a milder condition that still disrupts Protein A–Fc binding, increase ionic strength or include stabilizing excipients (arginine, sugars, polyols, or low concentrations of surfactant), and minimize residence time at low pH with immediate neutralization.
3. Evaluate practicality: altering the elution buffer composition (pH, buffer type, ionic strength, and including stabilizers) is a broadly applicable, simple first step because it directly targets the chemical environment causing instability without changing process sequence or requiring complex gradient setups.

Why the correct answer is correct:
Modifying elution buffer conditions is the simplest general approach because it can be implemented by reformulating the elution solution (choose milder acid, add stabilizers, adjust salt) to improve product stability during and immediately after elution. This approach is flexible and often sufficient across many mAbs and Fc‑proteins.

Why other options are less appropriate:
- Adding elution‑enhancing additives (NaCl/ethylene glycol/arginine) is a specific subset of buffer modification; it’s useful but narrower than the general strategy of tailoring the whole elution buffer.
- Eliminating the wash step is unsafe: washes remove impurities; removing them risks product quality and does not address pH‑induced aggregation.
- Reducing the wash→elution pH transition slope (gentler gradient) may reduce shock but is operationally more complex and can prolong exposure to intermediate pH that still promotes aggregation.

Conclusion: Modifying the elution buffer conditions to improve product stability is the most straightforward, general solution. This matches the provided correct answer.

§5.3 states the simplest general approach to reduce aggregation/precipitation during Protein A elution is often:单项选择题

类似问题

Protein A column regeneration is typically carried out with:

Which statement is NOT true about Protein A as an industry-standard capture resin?

Why are alternatives to Protein A capture being actively pursued?

In Fig. 5.2, the elution peak is narrow and tall. What does this most strongly indicate?

Protein A column regeneration is typically carried out with:

Nonspecific binding is rarely minimized in practice primarily because:

Gottschalk (and Kelley) note that the Protein A capture step is generally robust, but some [of its] variables may still be influenced by product or feed-stream variations. Which option best lists those variables?

Which one would be the best choice to use for an affinity chromatography to purify a DNA polymerase?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单