A company makes a claim that is PROVEN FALSE - contradicted by their own statements. Which sin is this?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Fibbing means making an outright false claim — saying something that is contradicted by evidence or by the speaker’s own statements.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Fibbing: knowingly or demonstrably false claims; claims contradicted by evidence or prior statements.
- No Proof: assertions lacking supporting evidence, but not necessarily proven false.
- Vagueness: imprecise or ambiguous language that avoids specifics.
- Hidden Trade-Off: highlighting one desirable attribute while omitting a negative attribute or cost linked to it.

2) Step‑by‑step reasoning
- The prompt states the company’s claim is PROVEN FALSE and is contradicted by the company’s own statements. That establishes the claim is not merely unsupported or vague — it is actually false based on available evidence.
- Compare this situation to each answer option:
  a. Vagueness would apply if the claim were ambiguous or lacked specificity; the prompt says the claim is proven false, so vagueness does not fit.
  b. No Proof fits when a claim has no evidence to support it, but the prompt goes beyond “no proof”: there is positive evidence contradicting the claim, so it’s not merely unsupported.
  c. Fibbing directly matches: a false claim demonstrated by contradiction (especially by the company’s own statements) is an instance of fibbing.
  d. Hidden Trade‑Off refers to omitting downsides while highlighting benefits; the prompt indicates an outright falsehood, not an omission of trade‑offs.

3) Calculations
- None required for this conceptual question.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Because the claim is demonstrably false (contradicted by the company’s own statements), the behavior is best described as fibbing — presenting an asserted fact that is untrue.

5) Why the other options are incorrect (brief)
- Vagueness: would be lack of clarity, not proven false.
- No Proof: absence of evidence, not active contradiction by evidence.
- Hidden Trade‑Off: omission of negative aspects, not an explicit falsehood.

6) Conclusion
- The correct answer is c. Fibbing, which matches the provided answer.

A company makes a claim that is PROVEN FALSE - contradicted by their own statements. Which sin is this?单项选择题

类似问题

A product uses terms like "natural," "green," or "eco-friendly" that have NO legal definition. Which sin is this?

A company sells "organic cigarettes" or "eco-friendly SUVs" - the whole product category is harmful. Which sin is this?

A company makes a claim that is PROVEN FALSE - contradicted by their own statements. Which sin is this?

A product claims "CFC-free!" but CFCs have been banned by law since 1996. The claim is true but completely useless. Which sin is this?

A company sells "organic cigarettes" or "eco-friendly SUVs". The claim might be true, but the whole product category is harmful. Which sin is this?

A company sells "organic cigarettes" or "eco-friendly SUVs". The claim might be true, but the whole product category is harmful. Which sin is this?

Question at position 8 An excess of growth hormone (GH) before puberty can result in the development ofgigantism.Graves' disease.acromegaly.pituitary dwarfism.Clear my selection

Question at position 6 The most abundant supporting cells in the central nervous system are called Question Blank 1 of 1[input].

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单