A company makes a claim that is PROVEN FALSE - contradicted by their own statements. Which sin is this?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Fibbing refers to an outright false or fabricated environmental claim — a statement that is contradicted by facts or the company’s own documentation.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- The Seven Sins of Greenwashing (e.g., Hidden Trade-Off, Vagueness, No Proof, Fibbing) classify misleading environmental claims.
- Hidden Trade-Off: highlights one benefit while ignoring other significant environmental harms.
- Vagueness: uses imprecise or ambiguous language (e.g., “eco-friendly”) that can’t be verified.
- No Proof: makes a verifiable-sounding claim but offers no accessible evidence or certification.
- Fibbing: makes a claim that is demonstrably false or contradicted by objective evidence (including the company’s own statements).

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- The prompt specifies the claim is PROVEN FALSE and contradicted by the company’s own statements. That means there is objective evidence showing the claim is untrue.
- Compare definitions: Hidden Trade-Off and Vagueness imply partial truth or ambiguity, not outright falsity. No Proof implies lack of evidence, not proven contradiction.
- Only Fibbing explicitly covers statements that are false or fabricated — the claim is factually incorrect.

3) Intermediate “calculation” steps (logical)
- Is the claim merely vague? No — it is proven false.
- Is the claim lacking proof? No — there is proof, and it contradicts the claim.
- Is the claim hiding trade-offs? No — the core problem is falsity, not omission.
- Therefore it matches Fibbing.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Fibbing denotes claims proven false; the prompt’s emphasis on contradiction by the company’s own statements fits the definition exactly.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- Hidden Trade-Off: would apply if an environmental benefit was highlighted while ignoring other harms — not the case here.
- Vagueness: would apply if the language were ambiguous, not explicitly false.
- No Proof: would apply if no evidence were available; here evidence exists and disproves the claim.

6) Conclusion
This reasoning confirms the correct choice is d. Fibbing, matching the provided answer.

A company makes a claim that is PROVEN FALSE - contradicted by their own statements. Which sin is this?单项选择题

类似问题

A product uses terms like "natural," "green," or "eco-friendly" that have NO legal definition. Which sin is this?

A company makes a claim that is PROVEN FALSE - contradicted by their own statements. Which sin is this?

A company sells "organic cigarettes" or "eco-friendly SUVs" - the whole product category is harmful. Which sin is this?

A product claims "CFC-free!" but CFCs have been banned by law since 1996. The claim is true but completely useless. Which sin is this?

A company sells "organic cigarettes" or "eco-friendly SUVs". The claim might be true, but the whole product category is harmful. Which sin is this?

A company sells "organic cigarettes" or "eco-friendly SUVs". The claim might be true, but the whole product category is harmful. Which sin is this?

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单