A company selects leaders solely based on personality traits such as charisma and confidence, but many of these leaders perform poorly in different organisational contexts.
What is the main issue illustrated?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Trait theory assumes consistent personality characteristics determine who will be an effective leader, so selecting leaders solely for charisma and confidence ignores how context shapes success.

Relevant knowledge points:
- Trait theory: posits certain stable traits (e.g., intelligence, confidence, charisma) are linked to leadership emergence.
- Situational/contingency perspectives (Fiedler, Hersey-Blanchard, path–goal): leadership effectiveness depends on context — task structure, follower readiness, organisational culture and situational demands.
- Person–situation interaction: traits may predict behavior, but situational moderators strongly influence outcomes.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. The company selects leaders only on traits (charisma, confidence). That is a pure trait-based selection approach.
2. Many chosen leaders perform poorly across different organisational contexts. Empirical and theoretical literature shows that a trait that aids leadership in one context (e.g., charismatic public speaking) can be ineffective or even harmful in another (e.g., technical, safety-critical, or crisis environments).
3. The mismatch between leader traits and situational demands indicates the selection criterion omitted situational factors. Contingency theories predict exactly this pattern: effectiveness depends on fit between leader style/traits and context.
4. Therefore the main issue is not that personality traits are always irrelevant or that leadership behaviour never matters; rather, it is that the trait-only approach disregards situational influences.

Why the correct option is correct:
- "Trait theory ignores situational factors" captures that the company relied on trait-based selection and failed to consider contextual fit, explaining the observed poor performance.

Why other options are incorrect:
- "Leaders should not have strong personalities": incorrect; having strong personality traits is not inherently bad and can be beneficial in some situations.
- "Traits are irrelevant to leadership": incorrect; traits matter but are insufficient alone.
- "Leadership behaviour is not important": incorrect; behaviour and adaptability to context are crucial.

Conclusion: The best answer is "Trait theory ignores situational factors," which matches the provided correct answer.

A company selects leaders solely based on personality traits such as charisma and confidence, but many of these leaders perform poorly in different organisational contexts. What is the main issue illustrated?单项选择题

类似问题

What distinguishes the Idiographic approach from the Nomothetic approach in trait theory?

What was a major problem with the trait approach to leadership?

这些性格理论主要是描述性理论，因为它们试图识别与不同性格相关的特定维度或特征。

The basic premise of the early trait approach to leadership was that: 早期特质领导方法的基本前提是：

A personality researcher seeks to understand the reasons that a person uses drugs. Which approach is the researcher most likely to adopt?

Which of the following is a major theme or focus of studying personality from the trait approach?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单