For an individual class assignment, Chi and Juan decide to collaborate. Chi compiles research notes, Juan identifies the main findings, and both write their own original research papers. Is this:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Academic integrity distinguishes allowed collaboration from misconduct depending on whether students independently complete assigned work and properly attribute contributions. Key concepts: unauthorized collaboration (collusion) occurs when students divide substantive tasks on an assignment that is supposed to be done individually; plagiarism occurs when a student presents another person’s ideas, words, or intellectual labor as their own without attribution.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. The assignment is explicitly individual, so each student is expected to perform the full research and writing independently unless the instructor permits collaboration.
2. Chi compiled research notes and Juan identified the main findings—these are substantive intellectual contributions (research synthesis and analysis), not merely casual discussion points.
3. Both then used those shared, substantive contributions as the basis for their own submitted papers, without indicating that parts of the work were produced collaboratively or attributing the other person’s contributions.
4. Because they divided labor and then each presented a product that relied on the other’s work, their behavior constitutes unauthorized collaboration (they effectively colluded to split tasks on an individual assignment).
5. Because each submitted work contains ideas/results generated by the other person but presented as their own independent work, that also meets the definition of plagiarism (using another’s intellectual output without proper acknowledgment).

Why the correct choice is correct:
- This scenario fulfills both violations: it is unethical collaboration (collusion on an individual assignment) and it is plagiarism (presentation of another’s work as one’s own).

Why other options are incorrect:
- “Unethical collaboration” alone misses that the students also plagiarized by not attributing each other’s substantive contributions.
- “Plagiarism” alone misses the specific nature of the wrongdoing as collusion—an organized, unauthorized division of labor on an individual task.
- “Acceptable collaboration” is wrong because the assignment was individual and the collaboration wasn’t authorized or acknowledged.

Conclusion: The best answer is “Both unethical collaboration and plagiarism,” which matches the provided correct answer.

For an individual class assignment, Chi and Juan decide to collaborate. Chi compiles research notes, Juan identifies the main findings, and both write their own original research papers. Is this:单项选择题

类似问题

Ethical considerations are important for the design, implementation, and reporting of psychological studies. What are the four principles of ethical research?

Disclosing your use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyse or present your findings is an example of which of the following principles?

What aspects of a research plan would an ethics committee consider important?

When reporting a potential breach of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, which of the following would be relevant information?

When writing the report about the interviews we will refer to participants using:

On the consent form, we will collect:

Which of the following is not of ethical concern regarding survey research on the Internet?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单