Question39 How does the 'too-big-to-fail' doctrine create moral hazard in the financial system? Institutions expecting government bailouts face an incentive to take excessive risk, because private gains are kept while losses are socialised to taxpayers Too-big-to-fail designation subjects institutions to heightened regulatory scrutiny and capital surcharges, making them more conservative and less willing to lend Systemically important institutions must pay higher deposit insurance premiums, reducing profitability and constraining their capacity to extend credit Government bailout guarantees eliminate banks' incentive to raise equity capital from private investors, causing chronic under-capitalisation across the sector ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Moral hazard arises when an actor is protected from the negative consequences of risky behavior, so they have an incentive to take on greater risk than they otherwise would. In finance, "too-big-to-fail" (TBTF) creates that protection because large, systemic institutions expect government support to prevent catastrophic failure.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Moral hazard: protected agents take on excessive risk because losses are borne by others.  
- TBTF: designation or market belief that certain institutions will be rescued to avoid system-wide damage.  
- Incentive structure: if upside is private (profits) and downside is socialised (taxpayer-funded bailouts), risk-taking is biased upward.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: Market participants (bank managers, shareholders) recognize that a TBTF firm is likely to receive government support in distress.  
- Step 2: This expectation reduces the private cost of risky decisions: potential losses will be cushioned externally.  
- Step 3: Managers pursue higher-risk, higher-return strategies because they capture gains while downside is limited by anticipated bailouts.  
- Step 4: Aggregate result: the financial system faces greater systemic risk as TBTF firms take on excessive leverage or engage in risky activities.

3. Calculations/intermediate steps
- No numerical calculation is required; the argument is incentive-based. Intermediate logical steps are given above.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The first option precisely describes moral hazard: private gains retained by the institution, while losses are socialised to taxpayers via bailouts. That is the textbook mechanism by which TBTF induces excessive risk-taking.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- Option 2: Heightened scrutiny and capital surcharges are regulatory responses intended to reduce risk, not the mechanism creating moral hazard.  
- Option 3: Higher deposit insurance premiums are a possible policy tool and would deter risk, but they do not describe how TBTF creates moral hazard.  
- Option 4: Chronic under-capitalisation from bailout expectations is related but is a specific consequence, not the core moral-hazard explanation; moreover, it overstates that guarantees fully eliminate equity-raising incentives.

6. Conclusion
The correct answer is: "Institutions expecting government bailouts face an incentive to take excessive risk, because private gains are kept while losses are socialised to taxpayers." This matches the provided answer.

类似问题

One way to reduce the problem of moral hazard is

Peter has bought a life insurance policy that pays his family $2 million if he dies. After buying the policy, he does not hesitate to enjoy his favorite hobby of skydiving. Peter's behavior is an example of

I always buy premium grade gas for my Chevrolet Malibu. But when I am on a vacation and I rent the same model from a rental company, I fill the tank with cheapest regular-grade gas. My behavior can be seen as an example of

Question at position 1 Although the FDIC was created to prevent bank failures, its existence encourages banks tohold too much capitaltake too much riskhold too many depositsopen too many branches

What is the term for a situation in which distorted incentives arise because an individual has private information about their own actions, but someone else bears the costs of a lack of care or effort?

The main reason for depositors asking for more protection in the presence of deposit insurance is that their bank could

Which of the following situations is an example of moral hazard in credit markets?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单