Question at position 21 Human beings will often reason from the specific to the general. That is, people often will form general rules and concepts based on specific experiences and examples. This type of reasoning is termedmetacognitionproblem spacinginductive reasoningdeductive reasoningsubgoaling单项选择题
A
metacognition
B
problem spacing
C
inductive reasoning
D
deductive reasoning
E
subgoaling

Question

Question at position 21 Human beings will often reason from the specific to the general. That is, people often will form general rules and concepts based on specific experiences and examples. This type of reasoning is termedmetacognitionproblem spacinginductive reasoningdeductive reasoningsubgoaling单项选择题

A

metacognition

B

problem spacing

C

inductive reasoning

D

deductive reasoning

E

subgoaling

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a question about a specific type of reasoning described as people forming general rules from specific experiences and examples. I will evaluate each option in turn.
Option 1: metacognition. Metacognition refers to thinking about one's own thinking processes—reflecting on how we learn, plan, monitor comprehension, and adjust strategies. It is not the term for deriving general rules from particular instances, so this option is incorrect.
Option 2: problem spacing. Problem spacing relates to the distribution of study or practice problems over time (spaced repetition) to improve learning. It has to do with study design, not the cognitive process of generalizing from specifics. This makes it an unsuitable label for the described reasoning.
Option 3: inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is precisely the process of forming general conclusions, rules, or theories based on specific observations or examples. This aligns with the description given in the question, making it the correct match.
Option 4: deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning starts from general principles or premises and derives specific conclusions. It moves from the general to the particular, which is the opposite direction of the described reasoning in the question, so this choice is incorrect.
Option 5: subgoaling. Subgoaling is a strategy in problem-solving where a larger goal is broken into smaller, more manageable subgoals. While it relates to planning, it does not capture the specific idea of generalizing from concrete instances to a rule, so this is not the correct term here.

类似问题

Question at position 3 A dog bit Sam when he was a small child, and now Sam believes all dogs bite. Which of the following is a type of reasoning that Sam is using to come to this conclusion?InductiveDeductiveIconicEchoic

Question at position 34 II and IIII onlyI and IIII and IIIII and IV

Real-world observations lead to new ideas in which type of reasoning?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单