Which of the following help convince managers to work in the best interest of the stockholders? Assume there are no golden parachutes.

I. Compensation based on the value of the stock.

II. Stock option plans.

III. Threat of a company takeover.

IV. Threat of a proxy fight.

Question

Which of the following help convince managers to work in the best interest of the stockholders? Assume there are no golden parachutes.

I. Compensation based on the value of the stock.

II. Stock option plans.

III. Threat of a company takeover.

IV. Threat of a proxy fight.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Tying manager rewards to firm value aligns incentives—so I and II clearly help. Additionally, external governance pressures (takeovers and proxy fights) discipline management, so III and IV also help. With no golden parachutes, all four mechanisms are credible threats or incentives that push managers to act in stockholders’ best interest.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Principal–agent problem: managers (agents) may pursue personal goals divergent from shareholders (principals).
- Incentive alignment: compensation tied to stock value or stock options links manager payoff to shareholder wealth.
- Market for corporate control: threat of takeover disciplines poor management because an acquirer can replace managers.
- Shareholder activism/proxy fights: shareholders can replace directors or influence strategy, constraining managerial discretion.
- Golden parachute note: without golden parachutes, takeovers are less costly and thus more effective as a disciplinary mechanism.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- I (Compensation based on stock value): If managers’ pay rises with stock value, they internalize shareholder welfare; they will pursue value-maximizing projects.
- II (Stock option plans): Options give managers upside if stock price increases, motivating them to increase long-term stock price. Although options can encourage risk-taking, their primary effect is to align incentives.
- III (Threat of a takeover): Poor performance makes a firm a takeover target; acquirers typically replace management, so managers have an incentive to improve performance to avoid being fired.
- IV (Threat of a proxy fight): Shareholders can mobilize votes to replace the board or management; this threat keeps managers responsive to owners.

3. Calculations/intermediate steps
- No numeric calculations are required. The logical intermediate step: each mechanism creates either aligned incentives (I, II) or an external enforcement threat (III, IV), both reduce agency costs.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Each listed mechanism either directly ties manager rewards to shareholder wealth (I and II) or imposes credible outside discipline (III and IV). Together they address the principal–agent conflict and encourage managers to act in shareholders’ best interest. The absence of golden parachutes strengthens the takeover threat, making III effective.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- "I and II only": excludes takeover and proxy threats, which are effective governance mechanisms.
- "III and IV only": excludes direct incentive alignment from compensation and options.
- "I, II, and III only": omits proxy fights, which are a real corrective mechanism.
- "I, III, and IV only": omits stock options, a common incentive device that aligns interests.
Each of these omits at least one valid mechanism, so they are incomplete.

6. Conclusion
All four mechanisms (I, II, III, and IV) help convince managers to work in stockholders’ best interest. This matches the provided correct answer: I, II, III, and IV.

Which of the following help convince managers to work in the best interest of the stockholders? Assume there are no golden parachutes. I. Compensation based on the value of the stock. II. Stock option plans. III. Threat of a company takeover. IV. Threat of a proxy fight.单项选择题

类似问题

Which one of the following parties has ultimate control of a corporation?

Question at position 18 Related linked firms share more resources and assets between their businesses than do related constrained firmsTrueFalse

Which of the following is NOT part of the Private Capital Market (PCM) 'recipe' for addressing agency problems?

Control rights in PE-backed companies are particularly important because:

In the PCM governance model, 'anti-diversification' for portfolio company management refers to:

Which of the following forms of engagement is most likely seen by engagement professionals as normal engagement dialogue with companies?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单