GreenFields Agriculture Pty Ltd supplies produce to supermarkets. The company’s director, Arun, receives:

Weekly emails from the bookkeeper warning of unpaid BAS and PAYG tax
Multiple letters of demand from suppliers
Advice from the company’s accountant that cash flow is “critical”

Arun does not review the company’s financial statements and continues to place large supply orders.

Which of the following should the directors have done? (Two possible answers)

Question

GreenFields Agriculture Pty Ltd supplies produce to supermarkets. The company’s director, Arun, receives:

Weekly emails from the bookkeeper warning of unpaid BAS and PAYG tax
Multiple letters of demand from suppliers
Advice from the company’s accountant that cash flow is “critical”

Arun does not review the company’s financial statements and continues to place large supply orders.

Which of the following should the directors have done? (Two possible answers)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Directors have a statutory duty under the Corporations Act to prevent insolvent trading and to act with care and diligence. When a director receives repeated warning signs — unpaid BAS and PAYG notices, supplier demand letters, and an accountant advising cash flow is “critical” — those are reasonable grounds to suspect the company may be insolvent or heading toward insolvency. Once those grounds exist, continuing to incur new debts can expose directors to personal liability.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Corporations Act duties (s180 duty of care; s588G prohibition on insolvent trading): directors must take steps to avoid incurring debts when insolvency is real or likely.
- What sensible steps are: obtain professional advice (accountant, insolvency practitioner, restructuring advisor) and, where necessary, stop trading to limit further debts and losses to creditors.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Evidence: weekly warning emails about unpaid tax, letters of demand from suppliers, and explicit accountant advice that cash flow is critical. These collectively give reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency.
- Legal consequence: if Arun continued trading and placed large orders after these warnings, he risked breaching the duty to prevent insolvent trading and could be personally liable for debts incurred thereafter.
- Appropriate responses: seek professional help to investigate options (work out a restructure, voluntary administration or liquidation advice) and stop trading (or at least stop incurring further unsecured liabilities) until solvency is clarified.

3) Intermediate logical steps
- Warning signs → reasonable suspicion of insolvency → duty to act → obtain expert advice and cease trading to avoid further creditor harm.

4) Why the correct answers are correct
- “Sought profesional help” (i.e., obtain insolvency or restructuring advice) allows informed decisions and may provide defenses under law.
- “Stopped trading” prevents accumulation of further debt that could worsen creditors’ position and expose the director to liability.

5) Why other responses would be incorrect
- Ignoring warnings or continuing to place large orders would likely breach duties and increase personal exposure. Merely hoping cash flow will improve without professional assessment is inadequate.

Conclusion: The appropriate actions are Sought profesional help and Stopped trading, which matches the provided correct answers.

类似问题

Which one of the following parties has ultimate control of a corporation?

Which of the following help convince managers to work in the best interest of the stockholders? Assume there are no golden parachutes. I. Compensation based on the value of the stock. II. Stock option plans. III. Threat of a company takeover. IV. Threat of a proxy fight.

Question at position 18 Related linked firms share more resources and assets between their businesses than do related constrained firmsTrueFalse

Which of the following is NOT part of the Private Capital Market (PCM) 'recipe' for addressing agency problems?

Control rights in PE-backed companies are particularly important because:

In the PCM governance model, 'anti-diversification' for portfolio company management refers to:

Which of the following forms of engagement is most likely seen by engagement professionals as normal engagement dialogue with companies?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单