Consider the following sentence: Kate and Anissa walked to the bustling market.  Of the following constituency tests (and their corresponding grammaticality judgements), which ones accurately tests the underlined string (Kate and Anissa walked) for constituency? Choose all that apply.   多项选择题

A

They walked to the bustling market

B

Q: Where did Kate and Anissa walk to? A: The bustling market

C

*They the bustling market

D

*They to the bustling market

E

Kaleigh and Kelly-Ann walked to the bustling market, and Kate and Anissa did so too.

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道真实原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

True or False: In the sentence “I was surprised to find many fun parties in Scarborough,” the chunk “many fun parties in Scarborough” cannot be a constituent. We can confidently make this conclusion as it fails the omission test (*I was surprised to find __).

What is the motivation for performing constituency tests?

Consider the sentence: We test whether the underlined string is a constituent by replacing it with a single word, as in: "Lowen bought a scarf [ Select ] there then did so it ". This single word is not just any word, but the term we use to refer to such a word is [ Select ] enclitic pronoun antecedent pro-form This is an example of a [ Select ] Omission Reduction Movement Segment fragment Substitution test. Let's say the resulting [ Select ] paragraph utterance sentence question is grammatical. This gives us evidence that the target string [ Select ] is is not a constituent in original sentence.

Consider the sentence: Applying the Cleft test gives: *It was flowers that my neighbor planted the beautiful over there. Applying the One-substitution test gives: My neighbor planted the beautiful ones over there.   What might the ungrammaticality of the string generated by the application of the cleft test tell us? Choose all that apply.

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们，立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析，让复习快人一步！