In the article from popsci.com the term "friendly AI" refers to an AI that is

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the meaning of the term "friendly AI" as used in a popsci.com article, so we should evaluate each proposed characterization against that usage.
Option 1: "not going to wipe us out in its quest to attain its goals". This aligns with the common definition of friendly AI, which emphasizes safety and alignment with human values to prevent catastrophic outcomes such as human extinction. The core idea is that the AI’s objectives are aligned with human well-being, avoiding existential risks. This option captures that emphasis on safe, non-destructive pursuit of goals.
Option 2: "not used in military operations". While some discussions of friendly AI consider civilian and ethical dimensions, the term is not strictly defined as excluding military use. In practice, an AI could be designed as friendly in a civilian context but still be deployed in military settings, or vice versa. Therefore, this claim is overly restrictive and not a defining feature of the concept.
Option 3: "able to carry on a realistic conversation". While conversational capability is a feature of many AI systems, it is not what the term "friendly AI" specifically denotes. A system could talk convincingly yet act in ways misaligned with human values. So this option describes a capability, not the core intention of friendliness or safety.
Option 4: "able to solve problems that are of importance to humans". This describes a broad utility goal for AI but does not capture the safety and alignment emphasis that distinguishes friendly AI. A highly capable AI could still pursue goals misaligned with human interests, so this alone does not define friendliness.
Option 5: "able to compete with humans in complex games". Performance in games is a measure of intelligence or skill, not a criterion for friendliness or ethical alignment. A system could excel at games yet pose safety risks if its goals are misaligned, making this an irrelevant defining feature.
In summary, the most faithful interpretation among the options is the one that centers safety and alignment with human well-being, excluding the idea of harming humanity in pursuit of goals, while the other choices describe capabilities or contexts that do not define the concept of friendly AI.

In the article from popsci.com the term "friendly AI" refers to an AI that is Single choice

Similar Questions

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

Generative AI, according to Professor Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, poses a significant existential risk due to its potential to develop self-acting, sentient threats.

Question at position 12 In the future, it might not be possible to control the power of AGI.BothEricAlison

What keeps Mustafa Suleyman up at night when it comes to AI?

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler