Generative AI, according to Professor Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, poses a significant existential risk due to its potential to develop self-acting, sentient threats.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Professor Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru emphasize that large language models are statistical pattern‑matching systems—not independent, sentient agents—and they explicitly warn against anthropomorphizing them or claiming they will imminently become self-acting sentient threats.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- The 2021 paper "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots" (Bender, Gebru, et al.) characterizes large models as probabilistic text generators that replicate patterns in training data, inheriting biases and errors.
- Key concerns raised by Bender and Gebru include dataset provenance, bias and fairness, environmental and resource costs, and the sociotechnical harms of misuse and overhype—not assertions of sentience.
- Distinction between capability claims (useful/ harmful behavior) and consciousness/sentience: current models lack independent goals, agency, or subjective experience.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Interpret the statement: it claims Bender and Gebru say generative AI poses significant existential risk because it could develop self-acting, sentient threats.
2. Compare with their documented positions: they argue models are "stochastic parrots" and caution about societal harms from scale, misuse, and misleading narratives, but they do not claim models are sentient or will autonomously become conscious agents.
3. Assess implications: their primary warnings are about ethical governance, transparency, and limiting harms—addressable policy and design issues—rather than imminent existential sentience.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- Their published work and public commentary consistently reject treating models as sentient; they criticize hype that inflates capabilities and distracts from real, tractable harms.

Why the other option is incorrect:
- Choosing "True" would misattribute to them a claim about autonomous sentient threats they do not make; that overstates their position.

Conclusion: The correct answer is False, which matches the provided answer.

Generative AI, according to Professor Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, poses a significant existential risk due to its potential to develop self-acting, sentient threats.判断题

类似问题

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

Question at position 12 In the future, it might not be possible to control the power of AGI.BothEricAlison

What keeps Mustafa Suleyman up at night when it comes to AI?

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

In the article from popsci.com the term "friendly AI" refers to an AI that is

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单