Maia and Jin are taking Communication 101 and have an individual essay due soon. They decide to work collaboratively. First, they find some relevant readings. Then they make an essay plan together. Last, they decide who will write each section. At which point do they cross the line from acceptable collaboration to collusion?
(Refer to What is collaboration and collusion?)

Question

Maia and Jin are taking Communication 101 and have an individual essay due soon. They decide to work collaboratively. First, they find some relevant readings. Then they make an essay plan together. Last, they decide who will write each section. At which point do they cross the line from acceptable collaboration to collusion? 
(Refer to What is collaboration and collusion?)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Individual assessed work requires independent authorship; dividing the writing task between two students turns shared planning into unauthorised joint authorship. Relevant knowledge: "collaboration" permits discussing readings, sharing resources and jointly planning ideas, while "collusion" is when students submit work purporting to be independent but which has been produced in concert beyond permitted assistance—for example by dividing sections to write and submitting as separate individual essays.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Finding relevant readings together: this is permitted collaboration. Both students are gathering source material and can share references; there is no submission yet and no claim of independent writing.
2. Making an essay plan together: jointly outlining arguments, structure, and key points is normally acceptable as it helps clarify thinking. Students must be careful to use the shared plan independently when producing their own work, but planning alone does not create identical submitted text.
3. Deciding who will write each section: this is the critical act. If Maia and Jin allocate sections to write and then submit those sections as their own individual essays (or substantially similar essays derived from the shared plan), they have effectively co-authored the work. That undermines the requirement that each submitted essay be the student's own unaided work and therefore constitutes collusion.

Why the correct answer is correct: assigning sections makes the output a joint product rather than two independent pieces; that is precisely the boundary institutions draw between allowed collaboration and prohibited collusion.

Why earlier actions are not collusion: reading together and joint planning aim to develop ideas and understanding, not to produce the final text; they remain within acceptable collaboration. Conclusion: The action that crosses the line is when they decide who will write which section, confirming the provided answer.

类似问题

You are to include at least 10 references in your essay assignment. You run out of time and add two articles to your bibliography that you did not use to write your paper. Is this considered dishonest?

Do you think that Sarah was right to tell Simon that using the assignment guide is dishonest?

It is ok to cite information from the abstract.

I was super busy and tired, so I bought an essay from an Internet website, and then I changed a few words throughout. I agree with the thesis of the essay and I think all the ideas are similar to mine, so this is OK.

I have a really good memory. I remember most of what I read although I can’t always remember where I read it. My essays are usually full of memorized passages. That’s not plagiarism.

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单