Which one of the following statements is correct, all things being equal?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks us to identify which statement is correct when all else is equal. 
Option 1: 'The after-tax cost of debt increases when the market price of a bond increases.' This is incorrect in standard capital structure theory. When bond prices rise, yields fall, which lowers the after-tax cost of debt (since cost of debt is tax-deductible and tied to yield). So the statement as written contradicts the inverse relationship between price and yield. 
Option 2: 'Beta is used to compute the return on equity and the standard deviation is used to compute the return on preference shares.' This mixes concepts. Beta is a measure used in CAPM to estimate the cost of equity, not directly the return on equity in isolation; standard deviation is a risk measure, not typically used to compute returns on preference shares, which are usually fixed-coupon and valued differently. As stated, this pairing is muddled and inaccurate. 
Option 3: 'WACC is only applicable to firms that issue both common ordinary and preference shares.' This is false. WACC can be applied to any firm with a weighted cost of capital that reflects its sources of financing (debt, equity, etc.), regardless of whether it has preference shares. Many firms issue only debt and common equity and still compute WACC. 
Option 4: 'If you have both the dividend growth and the security market line's costs of equity, you should use the higher of the two estimates when computing WACC.' This is not standard practice. In practice, you choose a single cost of equity estimate consistent with your valuation framework (e.g., CAPM-based cost from the SML or dividend discount/growth model) and avoid arbitrarily taking the higher of two different models, which would bias the WACC upward. 
Option 5: 'A decrease in a firm's WACC will increase the attractiveness of the firm's investment options.' This statement aligns with fundamental capital budgeting logic. A lower WACC reduces the hurdle rate, meaning more projects will have positive net present values, making investments more attractive relative to the previous higher discount rate. It reflects the idea that cheaper capital broadens the set of opportunities that meet the required return threshold. 
Thus, when comparing all options, the statement in Option 5 correctly captures the effect of a lower WACC on investment attractiveness, while the others contain common misconceptions about debt pricing, cost of equity estimation, WACC applicability, and model usage.

Which one of the following statements is correct, all things being equal? 单项选择题

类似问题

Question textRio Tinto has $300 million in the capital, of which shareholders contribute 40%. Shareholders' required rate of return is 11% p.a. Creditors charge 6% p.a. interest. Rio Tinto's Weighted Average Cost of Capital is Answer 1 Question 6[input]% (round to 2 d.p)

Calculate WACC before and after the restructuring. (As we did in class, make a simplifying assumption that your expected ROE is equal to cost of capital, Re)

(Continued) What is the cost of capital (WACC) after moving to a 30% debt ratio?

What is WACC of Big Oil?

Suppose that you just received the dividend of $2, which is expected to grow by 1% forever. What is the firm's WACC? Hint: Use dividend growth model in slide 4 of Week10 to calculate Re.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单