Which of the following scenarios best reflects unconditional positive regard as Carl Rogers defined it?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To begin, let’s restate the scenario and options so we’re analyzing the same material from Rogers’ perspective on unconditional positive regard (UPR).
Question: Which scenario best reflects unconditional positive regard as Carl Rogers defined it?
Options:
- A friend tells you they made a huge mistake, and you immediately give them advice to fix it.
- A professor shares a personal story and you nod along, even though you're not really listening.
- Your roommate snaps at you after a stressful day, and while you don’t excuse the behavior, you remind them you still care and are there for them.
- You notice your friend is upset, so you tell them a story about when you felt the same way.

Option 1 analysis: Providing immediate advice after a mistake implies a judgmental stance or redirecting the person toward a solution rather than offering acceptance of the person as they are. Unconditional positive regard emphasizes acceptance and caring regardless of behavior, not primarily problem-solving coaching, so this option misaligns with UPR.

Option 2 analysis: Nodding while not listening suggests disengagement and lack of genuine positive regard. Unconditional positive regard requires a validation of the person and their experiences, which is inconsistent with apathy or indifference.

Option 3 analysis: This option shows you acknowledge the person’s distress, maintain caring and availability, and separate the person from the behavior by not excusing the misbehavior but still offering support. This aligns with UPR’s core idea: unconditional acceptance and caring for the person, regardless of their actions, along with supportive presence.

Option 4 analysis: Telling a story about your own experience can shift focus to yourself and may come off as redirecting attention away from the other person’s feelings. While sharing can be empathetic, it risks centering the helper’s experience rather than offering unconditional acceptance of the other person as they are, which is central to UPR.

In sum, Option 3 best embodies Carl Rogers’ unconditional positive regard by showing consistent care and support for the person while withholding judgment about their behavior, rather than evaluating or correcting them through advice, disengagement, self-focused anecdotes, or moralizing.

Which of the following scenarios best reflects unconditional positive regard as Carl Rogers defined it?单项选择题

类似问题

According to Rogers, good parents should

According to Carl Rogers, you can become a only if you experience from important others in your life.

For Rogers, the source of people's positive self-regard is:

Part of client-centred therapy consists of the therapist treating the client as a valued person, regardless of what the client says or does. Approval is not necessary, but acceptance without judgement is. Which of the following therapist attitudes does this describe?

Which of the following exemplifies the unconditional positive regard component of client-centered therapy?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单