P&G's shift from an international strategy to a transnational strategy in the 1990s-2000s was primarily driven by:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

A transnational strategy balances global efficiency and local responsiveness, so P&G’s shift reflects the need to compete simultaneously on cost, scale, and local adaptation.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- International strategy: centralized product development and limited local adaptation, often used when home-market products suffice abroad. 
- Global strategy: tight global integration and standardization to achieve economies of scale and cost leadership. 
- Multidomestic strategy: decentralization with strong local responsiveness and customization. 
- Transnational strategy: combines global integration (cost efficiency, knowledge sharing, centralized routines) with local responsiveness (local R&D, marketing, and product variants). 
- Context of 1990s–2000s: rising global competition, faster product cycles, advances in logistics/IT, and diverse consumer preferences across markets.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- During the 1990s–2000s, competitors and local brands improved quality while global firms sought scale advantages. 
- Pure global standardization would miss market-specific needs; pure local focus would forgo cost and R&D synergies. 
- To keep costs low and exploit global learning while tailoring products to local tastes, P&G adopted transnational practices: shared manufacturing platforms, regional R&D centers, and locally adapted marketing. 
- This strategic hybrid addressed simultaneous pressures: intensifying competition for both low cost and differentiated local offerings.

3. Calculations/intermediate steps
- Not applicable; reasoning is strategic and qualitative.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The chosen option explicitly captures the dual pressures (cost efficiency + local responsiveness) that make a transnational strategy optimal; this matches the documented drivers for P&G’s shift.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- “A desire to enter fewer markets”: opposite of P&G’s global expansion. 
- “Government mandates in host countries”: not the primary driver; strategy change was market-driven. 
- “A decision to eliminate all local customization”: contradicts the transnational emphasis on local responsiveness.

6. Conclusion
The correct answer is: Intensifying competition requiring both cost efficiency and local responsiveness. This matches the provided answer.

P&G's shift from an international strategy to a transnational strategy in the 1990s-2000s was primarily driven by:单项选择题

类似问题

A transnational strategy attempts to achieve:

A firm wants to become more transnational. Which organisational move is most consistent with Bartlett and Ghoshal’s argument?

In China, Starbucks is standardizing its operations while simultaneously decentralizing some decision-making responsibility to local levels to meet customers' tastes. Starbucks is following the __________ international corporate-level strategy.

[Capstone] Consider a firm that began with an international strategy but is now losing market share to lower-cost global competitors while also facing demands for local product customization. What strategic evolution is MOST appropriate?

In the transnational strategy, the flow of skills and product offerings should be multidirectional -- from home to subsidiary, from subsidiary to home, and from subsidiary to subsidiary.

Caterpillar's strategy of centralizing component manufacturing for scale economies while maintaining regional assembly plants for local customization best represents which international strategy?

Which of the following is pursuing a transnational strategy?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单