Which of the following is the best approach to motivate people to work harder for a team?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks for the best approach to motivate people to work harder for a team, so we need to compare how different incentive structures affect team collaboration and performance.
Option 1: Introduce group incentives and remove individual incentives. Rationale: Group incentives align everyone's interests with the team’s goals, encouraging cooperation, knowledge sharing, and collective accountability. When rewards depend on the team's overall performance, individuals are more likely to support teammates, reduce shirking, and focus on what benefits the group as a whole rather than pursuing purely personal gains. This approach tends to strengthen cohesion and shared purpose, which are critical for team effectiveness.
Option 2: Introduce stricter norms and regulations within the group. Rationale: While norms can guide behavior, tightening regulations can stifle creativity, autonomy, and intrinsic motivation. If people feel micromanaged or constrained, their willingness to go above and beyond for the team may decrease, especially for tasks requiring initiative and collaboration. Norms alone do not directly create the motivation to elevate collective performance.
Option 3: Reward people for their individual performances. Rationale: Individual rewards tend to promote competition rather than collaboration. When people are incentivized based on personal metrics, they may withhold information, rely on others to do team tasks, or engage in behaviors that improve personal standing at the expense of team outcomes. This can erode trust and reduce overall team effectiveness.
Option 4: Introduce operational procedures instead of people-oriented procedures. Rationale: Focusing solely on procedures without addressing people’s motivation can hamper engagement. While efficient processes are important, neglecting relational and motivational aspects—such as recognition, belonging, and shared goals—may lead to disengagement or turnover, which harms team performance in the long run.
In sum, option 1 best supports a collaborative, high-performance team environment by tying rewards to collective achievement, thereby encouraging mutual support and aligned effort. The other options risk undermining teamwork through competition, micromanagement, or neglect of motivational drivers.

Which of the following is the best approach to motivate people to work harder for a team?单项选择题

类似问题

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

President Trump hiring a corporate leader from the oil and gas industry to head the Department of Energy is an example of regulatory ; one intention behind this was to change environmental policy.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单