3. Which of the following best shows how third-party logistics (3PL) firms achieve cost efficiencies? The 3PL firms:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Third-party logistics (3PL) firms achieve cost efficiencies primarily by pooling assets and spreading fixed costs across multiple clients.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Fixed vs. variable costs: fixed costs (warehouses, IT systems, vehicles, management overhead) do not change with the volume handled in the short run; variable costs (fuel, labor per shipment) scale with activity.
- Economies of scale and scope: sharing assets across many customers lowers average cost per customer. Consolidation, route optimization, cross-docking, and volume discounts also reduce unit costs.
- Risk and inventory pooling: combining demand from multiple clients smooths variability and reduces safety stock needs.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- A 3PL invests in infrastructure (warehouse, fleet, WMS). Those are high fixed costs.
- By serving many shippers, the 3PL allocates those fixed costs across clients rather than each shipper paying separately.
- Operational practices (consolidating shipments, optimizing lanes, purchasing fuel/insurance at scale) convert fixed-cost investments into lower unit costs for clients.

3) Calculation example with intermediate steps
- Suppose a warehouse costs $100,000/year to operate (fixed). If one company paid alone: cost per client = $100,000.
- If 5 clients share the warehouse: cost per client = $100,000 ÷ 5 = $20,000.
- If 10 clients share: $100,000 ÷ 10 = $10,000.
- This simple arithmetic shows how average fixed cost falls as the number of clients increases.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- "Spread the fixed costs across several clients by sharing assets" directly describes the mechanism (pooling fixed assets and costs), producing lower average costs and improved efficiency—this is the central cost advantage of 3PLs.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- "Take over a shipper’s operation and replace all existing" describes full takeover or insourcing, not the standard 3PL cost-leverage model.
- "Work with clients to identify new capital investment opportunities" is advisory and may increase client costs; it is not the core cost-efficiency mechanism.
- "Expedite multiple shipments to meet a client’s urgent needs" increases costs (premium carriers, rush fees) and does not generally produce cost efficiencies.

6) Conclusion
The correct choice is “spread the fixed costs across several clients by sharing assets,” which matches the provided answer.

3. Which of the following best shows how third-party logistics (3PL) firms achieve cost efficiencies? The 3PL firms:单项选择题

类似问题

Provide the best rationale for what's wrong with supply chains today?

How has the Commit function changed in SCM?

The owner asks whether SCM or CRM should come first. Evidence shows repeat visits fell after three weeks of pastry stockouts. Which reasoning is strongest?

Which of the following refers to a company's suppliers, the suppliers' suppliers, and the processes for managing relationships with them?

Uncertainties in the supply chain arise from all of the following except:

The business value of an effective supply chain management system includes all of the following except:

An ________ serves businesses that primarily buy direct goods on a long-term sourcing basis.

31. Which of the following is not a major benefit of using fewer suppliers?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单