Which of the following problem would most likely arise in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) when economic incentives and restraints are not effective?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Weak or ineffective economic incentives and restraints in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) create persistent principal–agent problems, soft budget constraints, and weak performance accountability—so the most direct consequence is insufficient organisational vitality.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Principal–agent problem: managers (agents) lack strong payoff links to owners (the state), reducing effort or risk-taking.
- Soft budget constraints: expectation of government bailouts removes pressure to cut losses.
- Incentive structures: absent pay-for-performance, there is low motivation for efficiency, innovation, or rapid decision-making.
- Organisational vitality: refers to responsiveness, initiative, innovation, and ability to adapt and grow.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- If incentives/restrains are ineffective, managers and employees face weak links between performance and rewards or penalties.
- That reduces individual effort, discourages innovation and cost control, and encourages complacency or rent-seeking.
- Soft budget expectations mean poor performers are not disciplined by bankruptcy or market exit.
- Over time these behaviors accumulate: excessive bureaucracy, low initiative, aging workforce, and slow decision cycles.
- The firm becomes inert — lacking entrepreneurship, flexibility, and internal drive — i.e., insufficient organisational vitality.

3. Calculations
- Not applicable; this is conceptual reasoning.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Insufficient organisational vitality directly describes the systemic consequence of weak incentives: the organization loses dynamism and drive rather than immediately collapsing.

5. Why other options are less correct
- a) Slow technology advancement can occur, but it’s a specific symptom of low vitality rather than the most encompassing problem.
- b) Poor competitiveness is a likely outcome but is narrower; competitiveness often falls as a result of low organisational vitality.
- c) Bankruptcy from severe losses is less likely because SOEs often benefit from state support and soft budget constraints when restraints are ineffective.

Conclusion: therefore the best choice is d. Insufficient organisational vitality, which matches the provided answer.

Which of the following problem would most likely arise in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) when economic incentives and restraints are not effective?单项选择题

类似问题

Question textConsider the following function.The derivative of a function at a point dom can be calculated using limits as follows: Determine the derivative of the function .Input your response in the box below. Enter fractions if required, do not use not decimals. Answer 1 Question 1[input]

Question textConsider the following function.The derivative of a function at a point dom can be calculated using limits as follows: Determine the derivative of the function .Input your response in the box below. Enter fractions if required, do not use not decimals. Answer 1 Question 1[input]

Which of the following statement about Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms and “Southern Tour” is INCORRECT?

Which of the following may NOT be the reason why after 1949 China decided to adopt the system that industrial inputs and output were allocated administratively by a government:

The table below shows annual production possibilities (’000 million per year) for a country that can produce only apple or orange with the resources available. Which of the following statements about this country’s PPF is INCORRECT?

Suppose a student decides to spend two hours working at a part-time job instead of studying for an exam. She earns $40 from the job but scores 10 points lower on the exam than she otherwise would have. What is the opportunity cost of her decision?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单