10. Is the statement true or false? “Books are always more reliable than websites”.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks to evaluate the statement: 'Books are always more reliable than websites.'

Option 1: True. This claim is not accurate. While books can be thoroughly researched and edited, they are not inherently more reliable in all cases. Books may contain outdated information, errors, or biased perspectives, and not all books undergo rigorous fact-checking. Additionally, the pace of new discoveries means some websites can present the most up-to-date evidence.

Option 2: False. This answer is correct because reliability depends on the quality of the source, not the format. Websites can be highly reliable when they come from reputable publishers, scholars, or organizations; they can also include peer-reviewed articles, official statistics, and primary data. Conversely, some books may be outdated, biased, or poorly sourced. Therefore, the blanket statement that books are always more reliable is misleading.

In summary, reliability is a function of source quality, evidence, and review processes, not simply the medium (book vs. website). Both formats can be trustworthy or unreliable depending on specific characteristics such as citations, authorship, and currency of information.

10. Is the statement true or false? “Books are always more reliable than websites”.单项选择题

类似问题

8. Which indicates potential bias?

When deciding if a source of information is credible, what should you look for? Pick all that apply

When you hear a new health or science claim (e.g., about vaccines, climate change, or COVID-19), what is your first step?

What should you take into account when evaluating the credibility of a scientific expert? Select as many as apply.

When evaluation sources using the ‘REVIEW’ criteria the ‘I’ considers

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单