What is claimed to be “social” is in fact the result of human input shaped by computed output and vice versa—a sociotechnical ensemble whose components can hardly be told apart.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

True — the statement describes the sociotechnical character of many contemporary systems: what appears "social" emerges from a tight interplay between human actions and algorithmic processes.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Sociotechnical systems: configurations in which social (human) and technical (computational) components are interdependent.
- Mutual shaping/co-construction: humans design, train, and interact with algorithms; algorithms in turn shape human behavior, choices, and social norms.
- Feedback loops and datafication: human inputs (clicks, ratings, labels) become data that algorithms process; algorithmic outputs (recommendations, rankings) influence future human inputs.
- Examples: social media recommendation engines, content moderation, credit scoring, predictive policing.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
Step 1: Identify human inputs — explicit actions (likes, text, labels) and implicit signals (dwell time, sensor data). These create the dataset used by algorithms.
Step 2: Identify computed outputs — rankings, recommendations, predictions that affect what users see and how they act.
Step 3: Recognize feedback — outputs alter user attention and behavior, changing subsequent inputs; designers modify models based on observed effects.
Step 4: Conclude entanglement — because each side continuously alters the other, social outcomes are produced by the combined system, not by purely social processes alone.

3. Intermediate steps/examples
- A recommender uses viewing history (human input) to promote content (computed output); promoted content changes viewing patterns, which retrain the recommender.
- Moderation policies (human) generate labels for automatic classifiers; classifier decisions shape community norms, affecting future moderation.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
The phrase “components can hardly be told apart” is accurate: practical outcomes emerge from the interplay rather than separable causes. Treating them as solely “social” ignores algorithmic mediation; treating them as purely technical ignores human meaning-making.

5. Why the other option is incorrect
Answering False would deny the documented reciprocal influence between humans and algorithms and overlook empirical examples of feedback loops.

Conclusion: The correct answer is True, matching the provided answer.

What is claimed to be “social” is in fact the result of human input shaped by computed output and vice versa—a sociotechnical ensemble whose components can hardly be told apart.判断题

类似问题

When evaluating a new project, firms should include in the projected cash flows all of the following EXCEPT:

Provide the best rationale for what's wrong with supply chains today?

What is Blockchain and how is it relevant to supply chain management?

Why aren't most products today recycled and/or reused?

What can be said about Two Tier vs. Three Tier distribution?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单