According to the reading, members of a field tend to agree in their judgments because:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Members of a field have internalized the conventions and criteria of the domain, so their judgments converge because they evaluate cases against the same tacit and explicit standards.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Internalization: through education, training, apprenticeship and repeated practice, individuals absorb the norms, criteria, and methods of their discipline.
- Conventions and criteria: agreed-upon standards, terminologies, methods, and evaluative rules that guide assessment within a field.
- Intersubjective agreement: consensus that arises not from identical personal preferences but from shared frameworks of judgment (e.g., peer review norms in science, aesthetic standards in art criticism).

2. Step-by-step reasoning:
- New members learn the field’s language, methods, and evaluative criteria from mentors, curricula and professional practice.
- Repeated application of those criteria (grading, peer review, editorial decisions) reinforces the standards and filters out idiosyncratic judgments.
- Social mechanisms (peer feedback, accreditation, professional bodies) reward conformity to these standards and sanction departures.
- Over time most practitioners use the same benchmarks when assessing work, so independent judgments align.

3. Intermediate logical steps (no numerical calculation required):
- Training → shared concepts and methods.
- Shared concepts and methods → common evaluative procedures.
- Common evaluative procedures → similar judgments on the same cases.

4. Why the correct answer is correct:
Because agreement among members is best explained by internalized, discipline-specific criteria that provide a common measurement and interpretation framework. When people evaluate using the same standards, outcomes become predictable and consistent across evaluators.

5. Why other options are incorrect (briefly):
- Random coincidence cannot account for stable, widespread agreement across many cases.
- External enforcement (rules imposed from outside) may produce conformity but does not explain why individuals independently judge similarly when enforcement isn’t present.
- Shared incentives or background alone do not produce the nuanced, domain-specific agreement that internalized criteria do.

Conclusion: The provided answer — they have internalised the conventions and criteria of the domain — correctly explains why members of a field tend to agree in their judgments.

According to the reading, members of a field tend to agree in their judgments because:单项选择题

类似问题

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

President Trump hiring a corporate leader from the oil and gas industry to head the Department of Energy is an example of regulatory ; one intention behind this was to change environmental policy.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单