How can social networking sites reduce loneliness?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Social networking sites reduce loneliness by enabling communication, social support, and a sense of belonging — this is explanatory rather than argumentative, so the correct classification is "Not argumentative."

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Argumentative text: presents a claim or position and supplies reasons/evidence to persuade the reader (premise → conclusion).
- Explanatory/informational text: describes processes, mechanisms, or answers "how" or "why" questions without taking a position to persuade.
- The word "how" signals a request for explanation of mechanisms (e.g., ways SNS foster connections: increased contact, social support, identity affirmation).

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- The prompt begins with "How can..." which conventionally asks for mechanisms or methods.
- It does not assert a debatable claim such as "Social networks are good/bad" that would require defense.
- Therefore the intent is to elicit description/causal explanation, not persuasion.

3) Calculations or intermediate steps
- No numerical calculations are required. The logical intermediate steps are:
  a) Identify the interrogative form ("How") → explanatory intent.
  b) Check for claim language (no evaluative stance present).
  c) Conclude text type = explanatory/non-argumentative.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Because the question requests an explanation of mechanisms by which social networking sites reduce loneliness (e.g., increased frequency of contact, access to peers, online support groups, identity and belonging), it fits the definition of non-argumentative/explanatory writing. There is no thesis being defended, nor are there reasons marshaled to convince a skeptical audience.

5) Why the other option is incorrect
- "Argumentative" would apply if the prompt asked to defend or refute a claim (e.g., "Social networking sites reduce loneliness; argue for or against"). Here, no claim is being advanced that needs persuasion, so labeling it argumentative is incorrect.

6) Conclusion
- The question is an explanatory "how" question and therefore is correctly classified as "Not argumentative," which matches the provided answer.

How can social networking sites reduce loneliness?单项选择题

类似问题

Environmental scientists use many other kinds of knowledge to reach their goals. If a scientist wanted to know how best to urge people to adopt new ideas, they would need an understanding of Blank ______.

Perhaps the most crucial determinant of whether we like someone is whether he or she likes us. This best illustrates the power of

_____________ refers to the notion that the more we encounter a stimulus, the more we grow to like it.

When telemarketers call to ask if you care about poverty and then ask you to donate to a homeless shelter, which social influence technique is being used?

In all likelihood, there is a kernel of truth to the "what is beautiful is good" stereotype; that is, attractive people are often more warm and socially skilled than less attractive people. According to the self fulfilling prophecy, this is probably because

The Abilene Paradox is ______________?

A study finds that targeted group members are more likely to be seen as overly sensitive, whereas non-targeted group members are seen as more credible. Which explanation best accounts for this pattern?

Which one of the following is NOT a stated reason for why “shared realities” create closeness with people?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单