Question at position 9 Melissa and John have been happily married for 30 years because they have ensured that they have no opportunities to fight. Both of them have jobs, so they contribute proportionately to the household income and equally share all other responsibilities. Melissa and John's happy marriage can best be explained by theelaboration likelihood model.social contagion theory.social exchange theory.social identity theory.单项选择题
A
elaboration likelihood model.
B
social contagion theory.
C
social exchange theory.
D
social identity theory.

Question

Question at position 9 Melissa and John have been happily married for 30 years because they have ensured that they have no opportunities to fight. Both of them have jobs, so they contribute proportionately to the household income and equally share all other responsibilities. Melissa and John's happy marriage can best be explained by theelaboration likelihood model.social contagion theory.social exchange theory.social identity theory.单项选择题

A

elaboration likelihood model.

B

social contagion theory.

C

social exchange theory.

D

social identity theory.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Social exchange theory explains interpersonal relationships by weighing rewards (benefits) against costs (burdens) and expecting fair, reciprocal exchanges; satisfaction and stability result when partners perceive a favorable, equitable balance.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Social exchange theory: relationships are maintained when perceived rewards minus costs are high and exchanges feel equitable. Key ideas include reciprocity, fairness/equity, comparison level (expected standards), and comparison level for alternatives (perceived better options).
- Equity: partners feel most satisfied when contributions and benefits are proportional to each partner’s investments.
- Contrast with other frameworks: elaboration likelihood model concerns persuasion routes, social contagion theory concerns behavior spread through groups, and social identity theory concerns self-concept from group membership.

2) Step-by-step reasoning mapped to the vignette
- Melissa and John have been married 30 years and “have ensured that they have no opportunities to fight.” This implies proactive maintenance to keep costs (conflict, resentment) low.
- Both have jobs and “contribute proportionately to the household income,” indicating balanced economic contributions (equity in financial input).
- They “equally share all other responsibilities,” indicating fair distribution of household labor (equity in time/effort).
- Therefore perceived rewards (companionship, shared workload, stability) exceed perceived costs (conflict, unfair burden), and exchanges are balanced—conditions predicted by social exchange theory to produce long-term satisfaction.

3) Calculations
- No numeric calculations are required; reasoning is qualitative—assessing perceptions of costs vs. rewards and equity.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- The scenario explicitly emphasizes proportional contributions and equal responsibilities, which are central to social exchange/equity explanations for relationship satisfaction and stability.

5) Why other options are incorrect (brief)
- Elaboration likelihood model: relates to persuasion processes, not marital balance of costs/rewards.
- Social contagion theory: explains how behaviors/emotions spread through networks, not intra-couple exchange fairness.
- Social identity theory: explains group-based identity and intergroup behavior, not dyadic relationship equity.

Conclusion: The best explanation is social exchange theory, which matches the provided correct answer: social exchange theory.

类似问题

Which theory does the idea of bargaining resources in relationships such as marriage come to us from?

One frequent critique of social exchange theories is:

According to _____, helping occurs only when the benefits of helping outweigh the costs.

According to Social Exchange Theory, the equation Outcome = Rewards – Costs is a primary explanatory tool in determining whether people will stay in particular relationships.

How did Egyptian culture and governance change during the Ptolemaic period compared to the pharaonic period?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单