Before a takeover attempt, TechNova has 50 million shares trading at $90 each. A hostile acquirer purchases 10% of the shares, triggering a poison pill provision. The firm responds by issuing 60 million new shares at a price of $45 each to the remaining 90% shareholders. Assume the cash raised from the issuance is retained by the firm and total firm value adjusts accordingly. How much value is transferred from hostile bidder to other shareholders (millions)?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Context: The question describes a takeover defense where TechNova, with 50 million shares at $90, faces a hostile bid of 10% ownership. The firm counters by issuing 60 million new shares at $45 to the remaining 45 million shares held by other shareholders. The cash from the new shares is retained, and total firm value adjusts accordingly. We must determine how much value is transferred from the hostile bidder to other shareholders.

Step 1 — Establish the pre-announcement value and the bidder’s stake: The firm’s initial market capitalization is 50 million × $90 = $4,500 million. The hostile bidder acquires 10% of the shares, i.e., 5 million shares for 5 million × $90 = $450 million. This sets the baseline for the bidder’s investment and the potential loss/gain if price changes.

Step 2 — Understand the poison pill dilution mechanics: The firm issues 60 million new shares to the remaining 90% shareholders (which own 45 million shares) at $45 per share. The aggregate cash raised is 60 million × $45 = $2,700 million, which the firm retains. After the issuance, total shares outstanding become 50 million + 60 million = 110 million.

Step 3 — Compute the new total firm value and the new share price: Since cash of $2,700 million is added to the firm’s assets (retained), the total firm value increases from $4,500 million to $4,500 + $2,700 = $7,200 million. The new price per share (assuming the market values the firm evenly across all shares) is $7,200 million ÷ 110 million shares ≈ $65.45 per share.

Step 4 — Determine the bidder’s post-pill value: The hostile bidder owns 5 million shares after the pill. At $65.45 per share, the bidder’s stake is worth 5 million × $65.45 ≈ $327.27 million.

Step 5 — Calculate the value transferred to other shareholders: Initially, the bidder’s investment was $450 million (the cost to acquire 5 million shares at $90). After the pill and price adjustment, those 5 million shares are worth about $327.27 million to the bidder. The loss in value for the bidder is $450 − $327.27 ≈ $122.73 million.

Step 6 — Interpret the transfer: The $122.73 million loss in the bidder’s value effectively transfers to the other shareholders, reflected in the higher value of the remaining shares and the diluted bidder’s position as a result of the new capital structure. Rounding to the nearest hundredth or nearest tenth yields approximately $122.75 million.

Option-by-option evaluation:
- 122.75: This matches the calculation above, where the bidder’s post-pill value decline is about $122.75 million, representing value transferred to other shareholders. Therefore this option aligns with the economics of the described transaction.
- 98.4: This would imply a smaller transfer than the calculated decline in the bidder’s value. It would correspond to an alternative assumption about price or value effects that are not consistent with the given mechanics (retained cash and total value adjustment) in this problem.
- 106.8: This figure is also inconsistent with the derived bidder-value drop under the stated structure; it would require a different pricing or dilution effect than the one described.
- 70: This represents a substantially larger discrepancy from the computed transfer and does not reflect the post-transaction valuation dynamics described in the scenario.

Conclusion (for clarity, not stated as part of the answer per instruction): The correct transfer of value from the hostile bidder to the other shareholders, given the retained cash from the new share issue and the resulting price per share, is approximately $122.75 million.

类似问题

How did Egyptian culture and governance change during the Ptolemaic period compared to the pharaonic period?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

What is the name of the third party candidate in 2000 who was not allowed to participate in the presidential debates? Hint: We watched a video clip with him in class.

E.E. Schattshneider said, "Democracy is ________ save in terms of the parties."

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单