If bread is produced by using a constant returns to scale production function, then if the:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When analyzing returns to scale, we examine how output changes as all inputs are scaled together. Here, the production function for bread is said to exhibit constant returns to scale.
Option a: Doubling only the number of workers while not changing the equipment does not test scaling all inputs. With only one input doubled, the change in output is not defined by constant returns to scale, and in typical analysis this would imply a partial scaling, which is not the assumption.
Option b: Doubling only the amount of equipment similarly fails to vary all inputs together. Since constant returns to scale refer to proportional changes in all inputs, changing a single input while holding others fixed does not demonstrate the CRTS property and hence is not the right characterization.
Option c: Doubling both the amounts of equipment and workers means all inputs are scaled by the same factor (2x). Under constant returns to scale, if inputs double, output also doubles. Therefore, twice as much bread would be produced, perfectly matching the CRTS implication.
Option d: Doubling both inputs would imply quadruple output only under increasing returns to scale, where output rises by more than the input scale factor. Since the function is specified as constant returns to scale, quadrupling output is inconsistent with CRTS and incorrect for this scenario.
In summary, the key idea is that constant returns to scale implies proportional increases in output whenever all inputs are scaled by the same factor, which is exactly what happens in option c when both equipment and workers are doubled.

If bread is produced by using a constant returns to scale production function, then if the:单项选择题

类似问题

Gale Furniture uses labor, capital, and wood as inputs in its production of office desks. When Gale Furniture doubles the quantity of labor, capital, and wood, the quantity of office desks doubles. Gale Furniture’s production process is characterized by

Question5 According to Andreoni and Levinson (2001), the sweeper analogy is an example of: None of the other options are correct Decreasing returns to scale No returns to scale Increasing returns to scale ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Indivisibility of capital causes _ returns to scale due to in the __ production model.

Question at position 12 Which of the following is NOT a reason for decreasing returns to scale?technology changegrowth of bureaucracyworker disaffectionmanagement command and control problems

Suppose General Motors could triple its production of Cavaliers by tripling its production facility for those cars. This is an example of

A firm's production function is Y=F(K,L). If the firm doubles both K and L, output less than doubles. This implies

10. When a firm doubles its inputs and finds that its output has more than doubled, this is known as: A. Economies of scale B. Constant returns to scale C. Diseconomies of scale D. A violation of the law of diminishing returns

The production function Y=K1/3L2/3−G exhibits________ returns to scale in K and L. (Assume G is a positive real number.)

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单