Suppose exchange rates are defined as foreign currency per dollar and foreign goods per U.S. goods. According to purchasing-power parity, if the price of a basket of goods in the United States rose from $1,500 to $2,000 and the price of the same basket of goods rose from 600 units of some other country's currency to 1,000 units of that country's currency, then the

Question

Suppose exchange rates are defined as foreign currency per dollar and foreign goods per U.S. goods. According to purchasing-power parity, if the price of a basket of goods in the United States rose from $1,500 to $2,000 and the price of the same basket of goods rose from 600 units of some other country's currency to 1,000 units of that country's currency, then the

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Purchasing-power parity (PPP) implies the nominal exchange rate (e, defined here as foreign currency units per US dollar) should equal the ratio of the foreign price level to the US price level: e = P_foreign / P_US. The real exchange rate (q, measured as foreign goods per US goods) can be written as q = e * (P_US / P_foreign). Under absolute PPP, q = 1 and stays unchanged if both price levels move proportionally.

Step-by-step reasoning and calculations:
1. Compute the initial nominal exchange rate using prices before the change:
   - P_US_initial = $1,500
   - P_foreign_initial = 600 (foreign currency units)
   - e_initial = P_foreign_initial / P_US_initial = 600 / 1500 = 0.4 (foreign currency per $1).
2. Compute the final nominal exchange rate after the price changes:
   - P_US_final = $2,000
   - P_foreign_final = 1,000 (foreign currency units)
   - e_final = P_foreign_final / P_US_final = 1000 / 2000 = 0.5 (foreign currency per $1).
3. Compare e_final to e_initial:
   - e increased from 0.4 to 0.5, meaning one US dollar now buys more foreign currency than before. That is a nominal appreciation of the dollar (an increase in foreign currency per dollar).

Check the real exchange rate to ensure PPP consistency:
- q_initial = e_initial * (P_US_initial / P_foreign_initial) = 0.4 * (1500 / 600) = 0.4 * 2.5 = 1.0.
- q_final = e_final * (P_US_final / P_foreign_final) = 0.5 * (2000 / 1000) = 0.5 * 2 = 1.0.
- The real exchange rate remains 1.0, so it neither appreciates nor depreciates.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- Because e rose from 0.4 to 0.5, the nominal exchange rate (foreign currency per dollar) appreciated.

Why the other options are incorrect:
- "Real exchange rate would depreciate/appreciate": incorrect because the computed real exchange rate stays constant at 1.0.
- "Nominal exchange rate would depreciate": incorrect because depreciation would mean e falls, but e actually rises.

Conclusion: The nominal exchange rate would appreciate. This matches the provided correct answer.

类似问题

The price of a Big Mac in the U.S. is $3.41 and the price in Mexico is Peso 29.0. What is the implied PPP of the Peso per dollar?

Assume the implied PPP rate of exchange of Mexican Pesos per U.S. dollar is 8.50 according to the Big Mac Index. Further, assume the current exchange rate is Peso 10.80/$1. Thus, according to PPP and the Law of One Price, at the current exchange rate the peso is:

________ states that differential rates of inflation between two countries tend to be offset over time by an equal but opposite change in the spot exchange rate.

Which of the following is NOT correct about the law of one price and the purchasing power parity (PPP) theory?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单