12. The U.S. government built and runs the Smithsonian Museums in Washington, D.C. Admission to all of the museums is free.
We can conclude that:
A. There is a principal-agent problem.
B. Special interests engaged in rent-seeking behavior.
C. Private enterprise wouldn’t have provided the free service.
D. There is regulatory capture.

Question

12. The U.S. government built and runs the Smithsonian Museums in Washington, D.C. Admission to all of the museums is free. 
We can conclude that:
A.    There is a principal-agent problem.
B.    Special interests engaged in rent-seeking behavior.
C.    Private enterprise wouldn’t have provided the free service.
D.    There is regulatory capture.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This question asks us to interpret what the fact that the Smithsonian Museums in Washington, D.C. have free admission implies about economic and political concepts.
Option A: 'There is a principal-agent problem.' A principal-agent problem arises when agents (those who act on behalf of principals) have different incentives than the principals, leading to potential misalignment. While it is possible to discuss governance issues in a large museum system, the statement given does not by itself establish misaligned incentives between principals and agents. It’s not the strongest or most direct inference from free admission.
Option B: 'Special interests engaged in rent-seeking behavior.' Rent-seeking involves spending resources to capture economic rents through the political process rather than by productive activity. The fact that admission is free does not demonstrate that special interests spent resources to secure favorable regulations or funding in a way that extracted rents; the free admission is a public provision feature, not direct evidence of rent-seeking.
Option C: 'Private enterprise wouldn’t have provided the free service.' This is a plausible inference: providing free-admission museums is typically funded by government appropriations, philanthropy, or public subsidies, and private for-profit enterprises typically charge admission to cover costs. The absence of a market incentive to provide universally free admission makes this inference reasonable, given the public-good nature and non-excludability of museum access. In short, free entry is more consistent with government provision or public funding than with a typical private-market arrangement.
Option D: 'There is regulatory capture.' Regulatory capture occurs when regulated industries exert influence to favor the firms they regulate, leading to policies that benefit those industries at the expense of public welfare. The Smithsonian, as a government-run institution, does not present evidence of regulatory capture from the admission policy alone. The statement about free admission is not a direct indicator of capture by private interests.
In summary, while some options touch on legitimate economic concepts, the most direct and defensible inference from free admission to all Smithsonian museums is that private enterprise would not typically provide such a universally free service, making option C the strongest claim among the choices.

类似问题

Private supply of public goods is most likely to result in

Question35 Which of the following is an example of non-rival and non-excludable good? National defense Cinemas Paid parking space Fish in the ocean ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

1. Rivalry and excludability are the main characteristics of: A. capital goods. B. private goods. C. public goods. D. consumption goods.

Which of the following is a characteristic of a public good?

Which of the following is true of the marginal cost of providing a pure public good to one more consumer?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单