In an alternative placement described in Chapter 11.4, precipitation is introduced to replace polishing steps, but it has challenges. Which statement is NOT consistent with Chapter 11.4?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Late precipitation replaces one or more polishing chromatography steps by inducing selective precipitation of impurities (or product) late in the downstream process; however, introducing a precipitating agent creates specific process-development and regulatory challenges, particularly around residual precipitant clearance.

Relevant knowledge points:
- Late precipitation: a downstream operation placed after capture and viral reduction to remove remaining impurities, potentially substituting polishing ion-exchange (IEX) steps.
- Polishing chromatography: conventional method to remove trace impurities and ensure product purity.
- Precipitant clearance: regulatory expectations require demonstration that any introduced chemicals (precipitants) are removed to safe levels; absence of polishing steps can complicate this demonstration.
- Performance trade-offs: in some cases precipitation can equal or surpass IEX for specific impurities, but it complicates validation and control strategy.

Step-by-step reasoning against each option:
1) "Late precipitation can match or outperform conventional IEX for removal of some impurities in some cases" — consistent. Empirical cases exist where selective precipitation yields comparable impurity reduction for targeted species, so Chapter 11.4 supports this potential benefit.
2) "Late precipitation reduces the need to demonstrate precipitant clearance because polishing steps are replaced" — NOT consistent. Adding a precipitating agent increases, not reduces, the need to demonstrate its downstream removal. Removing polishing chromatography eliminates a presumed clearance step, so process developers must provide explicit data (mass balance, spiking, clearance studies) to show residual precipitant is below acceptable limits.
3) "A key challenge is proving downstream removal/clearance of residual precipitating agent" — consistent. This is a primary regulatory and technical hurdle described in the chapter.
4) "Late precipitation may be used to replace subsequent polishing chromatography operations" — consistent. That is the intent: use precipitation as an alternative polishing strategy.

Why the correct answer is correct:
Option 2 contradicts regulatory logic and the chapter’s discussion: introducing a precipitant necessitates rigorous clearance demonstration, not a reduced need. Therefore option 2 is the statement NOT consistent with Chapter 11.4.

Final confirmation: The correct answer is "Late precipitation reduces the need to demonstrate precipitant clearance because polishing steps are replaced," matching the provided answer.

In an alternative placement described in Chapter 11.4, precipitation is introduced to replace polishing steps, but it has challenges. Which statement is NOT consistent with Chapter 11.4?单项选择题

类似问题

Which answer choice explains why furanoses and pyranoses can be reduced by sodium borohydride despite having no carbonyl functional groups.

Which of the following statements describes a glycoside?

Which of the following structures represents chitin?

In solution, glucose exists in

According to Xenophanes, what should be avoided at a symposium?

What is "kottabos"?

Why are there so many naked figures in vase iconography?

Why was it necessary to have a "hydria" as part of the ceramic vessels used at a symposium?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单