According to the Cooperative Principle, what would we expect an adult discourse participant to generally do if another discourse participant appears to be violating a maxim?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When analyzing the Cooperative Principle in adult discourse, we look at how listeners respond to apparent violations of maxims.
Option 1 suggests getting really confused and leaving the conversation. While genuine misunderstandings can occur, the principle predicts that participants endeavor to maintain cooperation rather than abruptly exiting; retreating from the conversation isn’t the typical, expected reaction to a perceived maxim violation.
Option 2 states: 'Try to make sense of the other discourse participant's utterance as something that actually does conform to the maxims.' This aligns with Gricean theory: listeners assume cooperative intent and work to reconstruct the speaker's meaning, often reading the utterance as conforming to the maxims even if it superficially seems off, by inferring intended implicatures.
Option 3 claims: 'Accuse the other discourse participant of being uncooperative.' Although accusations could occur in tense interactions, the standard expectation under the Cooperative Principle is not to label the partner as uncooperative but to seek clarification or explanation by reinterpreting the utterance.
Thus, evaluating each option against the Cooperative Principle, the second option most accurately reflects the expected adult participant behavior: attempting to interpret the utterance as conforming to the maxims, and thereby uncovering intended meaning rather than abandoning the conversation or accusing the speaker.

According to the Cooperative Principle, what would we expect an adult discourse participant to generally do if another discourse participant appears to be violating a maxim?单项选择题

类似问题

John has the ability to talk informally with his friends and more formally to his teachers during class. Clearly John understands the _____.

German colleague's "we'll talk about this later", means:

Meanings are in people, not words and gestures.

According to lecture, ________________ considers the context in which words are used.

Tim seems to have meant one thing with his question "Pat, do you want to email Professor Liu about it?", but Pat seems to have understood it differently. Pat likely understood it in what way?

Tim seems to have meant one thing with his question "Pat, do you want to email Professor Liu about it?", but Pat seems to have understood it differently. What did Tim probably mean?

According to Maxim of Quantity, being under-informative in a conversation is uncooperative, but being over-informative is cooperative, because over-informative statements provide sufficient information.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单