Question at position 13 Which of the following is NOT a risk attributed to the Five Forces analysis? It underestimates the capabilities, resources, and core competencies of a firm. It can overlook synergies and interdependencies among a corporation’s various business units. It does not adequately account for social, political, and technological factors impacting a business. Five-forces analysis can help anticipate and exploit structural change.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Porter’s Five Forces assesses industry-level competitive pressures: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitutes, and competitive rivalry.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Five Forces framework: purpose is to analyze industry structure and profitability drivers.
- Common critiques: it is industry-focused (not firm-specific), can miss cross-unit synergies, and tends to ignore broader macro factors (social, political, technological) that PEST/PESTEL analyses capture.
- Distinction between a “risk of the framework” (limitation) and a “benefit” (what it can do).

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Option A claims it underestimates a firm’s capabilities, resources, and core competencies. Because Five Forces focuses on external industry structure rather than internal resources (VRIO/resource-based view), this is a recognized limitation. Therefore A is a valid risk.
- Option B claims it can overlook synergies and interdependencies among business units. Five Forces treats industries separately and can miss corporate-level linkages—this is a valid risk.
- Option C claims it does not adequately account for social, political, and technological factors. Five Forces is narrower than PESTEL and often overlooks macro trends—this is a valid risk.
- Option D claims Five Forces can help anticipate and exploit structural change. This is a positive outcome or benefit of using the framework rather than a limitation. It is not a risk.

3. Intermediate/analytic steps
- Compare each option against the framework’s focus: options A–C point to internal, cross-business, and macro blind spots—these match well-known critiques. Option D describes a capability (anticipating structural shifts), so it does not describe a shortcoming.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The statement “Five-forces analysis can help anticipate and exploit structural change” describes a strength or use of the framework, not a risk. Therefore it is NOT a risk attributed to Five Forces.

5. Why the other options are incorrect (as answers to “which is NOT a risk”)
- A, B, C are indeed risks/limitations: they identify internal-resource blindness, corporate-synergy blindness, and omission of broader socio-political/technological factors, respectively.

6. Conclusion
- The correct choice is “Five-forces analysis can help anticipate and exploit structural change.” This matches the provided answer.

类似问题

Which of the following are limitations of using a Porter's Five Forces analysis?

Which of the following statements best describes the objectives of Porter's Five Forces Frameworks?

Nathalie Hallie, Inc. produces leather wrist bands for smartwatches. The company sells those bands to leading smartwatch manufacturers around the world. Which of the following would indicate that Nathalie Hallie. Inc. has high bargaining power?

Porter’s Five Forces is a framework that examines

波特五力模型是一个分析框架，它考察……

What does the force of “Threat of Substitutes” refer to?

Question at position 11 The Five Forces Analysis allows a strategic manager to evaluate and understand an industry and its participants including suppliers, customers, and competitors. TrueFalse

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单