For Locke, Justin Trudeau is the same human being as the guy who got first elected as prime minister of Canada in 2015 as long as he remembers what he did in 2015.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement presents a version of Locke's memory criterion for personal identity, but it oversimplifies what Locke actually argued.

First, we restate the question: For Locke, Justin Trudeau is the same human being as the guy who got first elected as prime minister of Canada in 2015 as long as he remembers what he did in 2015.

Option analysis:
- If we were to take the claim at face value, it relies on the idea that remembering past actions alone guarantees numerical identity across time. Locke, however, ties personal identity to the continuity of consciousness and memory of past experiences, not merely to factual memory of deeds. This subtle distinction matters: one must remember having had those past experiences, i.e., there must be a continuous stream of consciousness linking the present self to the past self. 
- A potential misstep here is to think that knowing or recalling one’s actions is enough. Locke would push back by emphasizing that it is the possession of the same conscious experiences and memories of those experiences that constitutes sameness, not just knowledge of the events. Memory can be imperfect, fragmented, or even fabricated in thought experiments, yet the core idea remains that the chain of conscious experiences is what matters. 
- Another nuance is that even if Trudeau remembers his 2015 actions, there could be scenarios involving false memories or memory transfer that complicate identity in the Lockean framework. The statement glosses over these caveats, which reveals why it is not an airtight summary of Locke’s position.

Therefore, the claim that remembering what he did in 2015 alone makes him the same person is an oversimplified and potentially misleading rendering of Locke’s account. It conflates the broader notion of continuous consciousness with a narrower memory of past actions, which is not exactly how Locke framed personal identity.

In short, Locke’s theory centers on the continuity of consciousness and memory of past experiences rather than simply remembering deeds; the given statement does not capture the full condition and thus is not accurately stated according to Locke's view.

For Locke, Justin Trudeau is the same human being as the guy who got first elected as prime minister of Canada in 2015 as long as he remembers what he did in 2015.判断题

类似问题

David Hume, the British philosopher, famously argued

Locke’s story about the parrot is supposed to illustrate that something can be a rational animal even though it has no soul.

Locke thinks that if my soul is the same as the soul of Socrates, I am the same person as Socrates.

Locke thinks that I can be the same person in, say, 2002 and 2025, even if I no longer have the same soul.

Locke thinks that if the reincarnation of the soul happens, that does not show that the same person can exist at very different points in time, say centuries apart.

For Locke, if there is not the same consciousness between myself and anyone before 9/11, I am not the same person as anyone before 9/11.

Locke thinks that the identity of a human being over time depends on facts about their body.

Locke thinks that if my soul is the same as the soul of Socrates, I still may not be the same person as Socrates.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单