Which criterion for evaluating a theory refers to being simple rather than complex in explaining personality?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let’s break down what the question is asking: we’re evaluating a theory’s criterion for simplicity in explaining personality, i.e., avoiding unnecessary complexity while accounting for observations.
Option 1: 'Guides action' — This criterion describes a theory’s practical usefulness or predictive relevance, focusing on how the theory informs behavior. While important, it does not specifically address simplicity or parsimony in explanation.
Option 2: 'Parsimonious' — This term directly signals simplicity: a parsimonious theory explains phenomena with as few assumptions or constructs as possible. It aligns with the idea of keeping explanations straightforward rather than needlessly elaborate.
Option 3: 'Falsifiable' — Falsifiability concerns whether a theory can be tested and potentially proven false. This relates to empirical testability, not the simplicity of the explanation itself.
Option 4: 'Internally consistent' — Internal consistency means the theory’s components do not contradict each other. While desirable, this criterion does not specifically measure how simple or complex the theory’s explanation is, but rather whether its parts cohere without conflict.
In summary, the criterion that directly captures the preference for a simple, economical explanation in personality theory is parsimoniousness, whereas the other options emphasize usefulness, testability, or internal coherence rather than simplicity.

Which criterion for evaluating a theory refers to being simple rather than complex in explaining personality?单项选择题

类似问题

Elizabeth’s sister, Meredith, isn’t answering her phone when Elizabeth calls. Elizabeth thinks, “Well, either Meredith’s phone has been stolen, or the battery died.” Reasoning that Meredith’s phone likely died, and that her phone wasn’t stolen would best illustrate _____.

Which of the following trees corresponds to a potential parse of the ambiguous sentence below, with correct syntactic categories? Some diagnostics are provided.

Which of the following sentences contain two non-finite verbs? Select all that apply.

Analyze the following sentence: The sentence contains [ Select ] 8 6 5 7 3 4 functional words, [ Select ] 2 3 1 4 5 count nouns, [ Select ] 4 5 2 1 3 mass nouns, and [ Select ] 1 5 2 3 4 adjectives.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单